d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Flat Earth > Real Stars
Prev1676869707189Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Nov 3 2016 08:25pm
Quote (Knaapie @ Nov 3 2016 04:04pm)
you're behind on reading my posts. but thanks for shitting on me to try and make the difference ;)

come to think of it..

I remember having some friendly pms regarding the flat earth topic...
I might even be the most sympathetic glober on the forum ^^


yes that's true, you been the most open minded of anyone really.
Much more than some people who refuse to budge no matter what.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Nov 3 2016 08:32pm
Quote (Santara @ Nov 3 2016 04:22pm)
No, you don't get to pick both. The vast majority of those photos of Earth are taken by low Earth orbit satellites, so of course they have to be put together as composites. That in NO WAY means that they are trying to show you 50% of the planet in each composite, which is the logical assumption you're making. There is no reason to presume the pictures will have the same breadth as the others.

I showed you a link to pictures of Earth taken from high orbit, and your dodge manifested itself in "what about the colors?" But you failed to note that the photos were taken in multiple different spectra, including infrared, which was why the Earth's vegetation appeared red in one of the photos. You claim no photos of Earth exist that aren't composite, but in fact, I showed you several.


Yeah Nasa has even admitted that those globes are composites from 100s of high altitude Ariel photographs and then stitched together with the presumption the world is round.
I'm not about to spoon feed because your complete resistant to anyone opinion but your own, but feel free to educate yourself, that's what the internet is actually for instead of just confirming your bias. Remember that time you posted some outrage from some web article and it turned out was just a trolling comedy site - omfg that was so hilarious.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 3 2016 08:34pm
Member
Posts: 11,801
Joined: Nov 21 2008
Gold: 1,002.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 3 2016 08:34pm
Quote (card_sultan @ 4 Nov 2016 03:22)
I think you need to reread this thread and point out specific examples and i think you find that i never begin personally insulting without being insulted first.

IF you cant find an example - I will gladly apologize to that person - if you cant then they clearly need to offer an apology.


Yep, that post could have been seen as a personal attack. Sort of a mis-formulated concern, sorry for that.
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Nov 3 2016 08:35pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 3 2016 09:32pm)
Yeah Nasa has even admitted that those globes are composites from 100s of high altitude Ariel photographs and then stitched together with the presumption the world is round.
I not about to spoon feed you but feel free to educate yourself, that's what the internet is actually for instead of just confirming your bias. Remember that time you post some outrage from some web article and it turned out was just a trolling comedy site - omfg that was so hilarious.


So what you're saying is, you don't understand the importance of the distinction between how much of the globe they stitch together for an individual photo of a globular Earth and therefore will continue to think your picture of pictures of Earth means something. It also means you don't understand why the Earth's vegetation would appear red in the infrared spectrum.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Nov 3 2016 08:39pm
Quote (Knaapie @ Nov 3 2016 04:34pm)
Yep, that post could have been seen as a personal attack. Sort of a mis-formulated concern, sorry for that.


That post of mine where i ranted a little bit wasn't really about you, so im glad you didn't take it personally, I had other people in mind who shall remain nameless, so shhhhh, dont tell anyone ok?
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Nov 3 2016 08:41pm
Quote (Santara @ Nov 3 2016 04:35pm)
So what you're saying is, you don't understand the importance of the distinction between how much of the globe they stitch together for an individual photo of a globular Earth and therefore will continue to think your picture of pictures of Earth means something. It also means you don't understand why the Earth's vegetation would appear red in the infrared spectrum.


So what your saying is that you dont understand why you are not free to rage if people dont accept the composite and assumptions as a complete photo of reality?
Member
Posts: 11,801
Joined: Nov 21 2008
Gold: 1,002.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 3 2016 08:42pm
Quote (card_sultan @ 4 Nov 2016 03:39)
That post of mine where i ranted a little bit wasn't really about you, so im glad you didn't take it personally, I had other people in mind who shall remain nameless, so shhhhh, dont tell anyone ok?


and you finish it off with a trigger... so fucking typical.... sigh.
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Nov 3 2016 08:44pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 3 2016 09:41pm)
So what your saying is that you dont understand why you are not free to rage if people dont accept the composite and assumptions as a complete photo of reality?


Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.

Here's the link again, for the best resolution, high quality, non-composite photo of Earth available:

http://gizmodo.com/5909215/this-is-the-definitive-photograph-of-planet-earth
Member
Posts: 87,007
Joined: May 12 2013
Gold: 1,590.64
Nov 3 2016 08:54pm
Quote (Santara @ Nov 3 2016 10:44pm)
Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.

Here's the link again, for the best resolution, high quality, non-composite photo of Earth available:

http://gizmodo.com/5909215/this-is-the-definitive-photograph-of-planet-earth


Nice
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Nov 3 2016 09:00pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 3 2016 06:22pm)
I think you need to reread this thread and point out specific examples and i think you'll find that i never begin personally insulting without being insulted first.

IF you cant find an example - I will gladly apologize to that person - if you cant then they clearly need to offer an apology.


http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=75166856&f=119&p=508939334
Quote (Santara @ Nov 3 2016 06:44pm)
Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.

Here's the link again, for the best resolution, high quality, non-composite photo of Earth available:

http://gizmodo.com/5909215/this-is-the-definitive-photograph-of-planet-earth


http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=75166856&f=119&p=508957993

This post was edited by majorblood on Nov 3 2016 09:02pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1676869707189Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll