Quote (Santara @ Nov 3 2016 04:22pm)
No, you don't get to pick both. The vast majority of those photos of Earth are taken by low Earth orbit satellites, so of course they have to be put together as composites. That in NO WAY means that they are trying to show you 50% of the planet in each composite, which is the logical assumption you're making. There is no reason to presume the pictures will have the same breadth as the others.
I showed you a link to pictures of Earth taken from high orbit, and your dodge manifested itself in "what about the colors?" But you failed to note that the photos were taken in multiple different spectra, including infrared, which was why the Earth's vegetation appeared red in one of the photos. You claim no photos of Earth exist that aren't composite, but in fact, I showed you several.
Yeah Nasa has even admitted that those globes are composites from 100s of high altitude Ariel photographs and then stitched together with the presumption the world is round.
I'm not about to spoon feed because your complete resistant to anyone opinion but your own, but feel free to educate yourself, that's what the internet is actually for instead of just confirming your bias. Remember that time you posted some outrage from some web article and it turned out was just a trolling comedy site - omfg that was so hilarious.
This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 3 2016 08:34pm