d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Mgtow 2021
Prev1666768697083Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 6 2021 07:00pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Sep 6 2021 07:48pm)
You are not supposed to say those things about yourself. It has nothing to do with whether you are truly competent, smart..etc. Those things are meant for other people to discover in you and then describe. One simply does not self-diagnose one's own awesomeness. It's something charming, elegant people don't do.

But I guess you aren't a charming, elegant person.

You are the last person who is qualified to call anyone pansy. You weaseled out of our exchange in that other thread by crying how I was just arguing semantics. Pathetic.


Looks like my smart awesome charisma has snagged another stalker.

I can't say I'm surprised
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Sep 6 2021 07:02pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Sep 6 2021 06:00pm)
Looks like my smart awesome charisma has snagged another stalker.

I can't say I'm surprised


:lol:
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Sep 6 2021 07:07pm
Anyway, my 2 cents on this topic, slightly tangential but still relevant:

I believe that men are naturally superior to women. I know this sounds weird coming from a woman, but I have a good reason for believing so.

Throughout our evolutionary history, women have always been selecting the best men to mate and have babies with. They wanted a man who was "better" in some way. It could be physical, mental, or even spiritual. For example, they wanted a man who was taller than they were. A man who was stronger than they were. Smarter, funnier, or even one with a better moral character (this is the reason why almost all religious prophets, who were thought to be morally superior, tended to be men). There has always been a very strong evolutionary pressure for men to be superior, because women were picky and they only wanted the best men. So, only men with superior traits passed on their genes. And when this happens for enough generations, eventually you will end up with men who generally tend to be "better" in every way imaginable. This isn't sexism or male chauvinism. It's biological reality.




This post was edited by JessiWan on Sep 6 2021 07:11pm
Member
Posts: 22,439
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Sep 6 2021 07:26pm
Quote (excellence @ Aug 30 2021 09:10am)
just wear a mask over your gimp costume. extra protection!


I have reported this post for being in violation of the site's rules, specifically Rule 22: No harassing PaRD's most based poster.
Member
Posts: 30,832
Joined: Jan 20 2007
Gold: 0.00
Sep 6 2021 07:33pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Sep 6 2021 09:07pm)
Anyway, my 2 cents on this topic, slightly tangential but still relevant:

I believe that men are naturally superior to women. I know this sounds weird coming from a woman, but I have a good reason for believing so.

Throughout our evolutionary history, women have always been selecting the best men to mate and have babies with. They wanted a man who was "better" in some way. It could be physical, mental, or even spiritual. For example, they wanted a man who was taller than they were. A man who was stronger than they were. Smarter, funnier, or even one with a better moral character (this is the reason why almost all religious prophets, who were thought to be morally superior, tended to be men). There has always been a very strong evolutionary pressure for men to be superior, because women were picky and they only wanted the best men. So, only men with superior traits passed on their genes. And when this happens for enough generations, eventually you will end up with men who generally tend to be "better" in every way imaginable. This isn't sexism or male chauvinism. It's biological reality.


"Fellow ladies of reddit, do you swallow? Why or Why not? (serious replies only, explicit details encouraged)"
Member
Posts: 22,439
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Sep 6 2021 07:45pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Sep 6 2021 06:07pm)
Anyway, my 2 cents on this topic, slightly tangential but still relevant:

I believe that men are naturally superior to women. I know this sounds weird coming from a woman, but I have a good reason for believing so.

Throughout our evolutionary history, women have always been selecting the best men to mate and have babies with. They wanted a man who was "better" in some way. It could be physical, mental, or even spiritual. For example, they wanted a man who was taller than they were. A man who was stronger than they were. Smarter, funnier, or even one with a better moral character (this is the reason why almost all religious prophets, who were thought to be morally superior, tended to be men). There has always been a very strong evolutionary pressure for men to be superior, because women were picky and they only wanted the best men. So, only men with superior traits passed on their genes. And when this happens for enough generations, eventually you will end up with men who generally tend to be "better" in every way imaginable. This isn't sexism or male chauvinism. It's biological reality.


Do you then think we should structure our society in alignment with the sentiment that it's "biological reality that men are naturally superior"?
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Sep 6 2021 07:49pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Sep 6 2021 06:45pm)
Do you then think we should structure our society in alignment with the sentiment that it's "biological reality that men are naturally superior"?


My personal thoughts:

Society should be based on true meritocracy. Which means men will naturally rise to the top, which would be fine by me. As long as women are guaranteed rights and equal protection under the law, for example, property rights, the right to access education, right to vote, equal pay for equal work, ...etc.

Thanks for asking.
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Sep 6 2021 07:50pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Sep 6 2021 08:48pm)
You are not supposed to say those things about yourself. It has nothing to do with whether you are truly competent, smart..etc. Those things are meant for other people to discover in you and then describe. One simply does not self-diagnose one's own awesomeness. It's something charming, elegant people don't do.

But I guess you aren't a charming, elegant person.



You are the last person who is qualified to call anyone pansy. You weaseled out of our exchange in that other thread by crying how I was just arguing semantics. Pathetic.


This topic is literal AIDS because ad hominem is the only thing that these SIMPS are capable of spittling out.

Like trying to carry sand in a sieve. Not worth saving these people.

Quote (JessiWan @ Sep 6 2021 09:07pm)
Anyway, my 2 cents on this topic, slightly tangential but still relevant:

I believe that men are naturally superior to women. I know this sounds weird coming from a woman, but I have a good reason for believing so.

Throughout our evolutionary history, women have always been selecting the best men to mate and have babies with. They wanted a man who was "better" in some way. It could be physical, mental, or even spiritual. For example, they wanted a man who was taller than they were. A man who was stronger than they were. Smarter, funnier, or even one with a better moral character (this is the reason why almost all religious prophets, who were thought to be morally superior, tended to be men). There has always been a very strong evolutionary pressure for men to be superior, because women were picky and they only wanted the best men. So, only men with superior traits passed on their genes. And when this happens for enough generations, eventually you will end up with men who generally tend to be "better" in every way imaginable. This isn't sexism or male chauvinism. It's biological reality.


Surprised to hear a woman go that way.

I wouldn't call men superior, but men and women have clearly defined strengths that are very different. There are some things that women can do that men can't.

Quote (Handcuffs @ Sep 6 2021 09:26pm)
I have reported this post for being in violation of the site's rules, specifically Rule 22: No harassing PaRD's most based poster.


You know you liked it.

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Sep 6 2021 07:54pm
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Sep 6 2021 07:50pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Sep 6 2021 06:50pm)
This topic is literal AIDS because ad hominem is the only thing that these SIMPS are capable of spittling out.

Like trying to carry sand in a sieve. Not worth saving these people.


Haha, sorry sir. I promise to keep ad hominems to a minimum from now on.
Member
Posts: 30,832
Joined: Jan 20 2007
Gold: 0.00
Sep 6 2021 07:55pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Sep 6 2021 09:50pm)
This topic is literal AIDS because ad hominem is the only thing that these SIMPS are capable of spittling out.

Like trying to carry sand in a sieve. Not worth saving these people.



Surprised to hear a woman go that way.

I wouldn't call men superior, but men and women have clearly defined strengths that are very different. There are some things that women can do that men can't.




What do you think women are better than men at?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1666768697083Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll