Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 29 2014 08:05pm)
your view on the entire situation is skewed (IMO) by the medias coverage of the issue
have you considered that the entire situation is less of a union battle and in actuallity a temporary, not permenant, attempt to reduce the state's defecit? because teachers sure didnt seem to consider that.
i never heard someone say "o well years from now well have the rights back, the state will be better economically, and the loss will be rather minimal overall to me personally"
my girlfriend is a teacher, i have 5 uncles/aunts that are teachers, and 2 grandmothers that taught. and when they consider the move as a temporary fix to the budget problem they accept it, they are mad but they still do their job.
Maybe if he wants to balance the budget he should reconsider the hundreds of millions of dollars that subsidize privately owned development for the rich and elite like the $500,000,000 that subsidized the Brewer's baseball stadium in the 90s rather than revoking first amendment rights from average citizens without great wealth or political clout.
Quote (Skinned @ Dec 29 2014 08:14pm)
I don't have Cable News or gossip shows like Fox News so no Third Person Effect here. Scott Walker and his ilk's ideological war isn't temporary. They want to strip public sector employees civil rights and never give them back. Their war is ideological and they actually believe that they are right in the universal sense, and not in a time and place sense. Scott Walker and his ilk want the unions to not exist anymore, plain and simple. This has always been the case, ever since some workers were treated bad somewhere, got together and said "fuck this, lets do something about this", and hurt profit.
That would have been my grandfathers, mining coal in Pennsylvania. Real American heroes.
This post was edited by RiskOfFire on Dec 29 2014 06:19pm