Reading wiki:

2024 Labour 33.7% (which is red color, ok ?)

Now read your chart (which goes up to 2025, ok?) it shows like 20% ? Wtf.

Try painting, photo, anything but not charts or maths

40% of the public did not vote. 33.7% x 60% (the share of the public that voted) = 20% of the whole public. There's your math.

His graph takes voter turnout into consideration, yours doesn’t. Your graph also doesn’t have any values on the Y axis.

Find better source without non-voters.
Non-voters are losers

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Jul 7 2024 11:32am

I'm sorry that your math isn't up to snuff. I suggest breaking out a calculator and confirming that 33.7% x 60% does indeed = 20%. Your graph only shows the results of the people who did vote. Mine includes the people who DID NOT VOTE (DNV). So when I said voter apathy is how Labour won, and I showed you how the proportion of the public that DID NOT VOTE spiked, it reinforced my point. Yes Labour won, even though their SHARE of the vote was worse than their 2 prior elections. This election was not a strong endorsement of Labour.

thats what happens when you skip math class LMAO

Non-voters are clowns they are almost never included in elections results/charts.
Well, let's be less rude; they just dont matter, and you know why ? Because they didnt vote. As simple as that.

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Jul 7 2024 11:42am

Try knee on neck compression.

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Jul 7 2024 11:45am

They're included when you are trying to examine the whole electorate. The only thing Labour had going for them is that they were *not conservatives.* They weren't overwhelmingly POPULAR like you silly leftists are trying to portray. They were simply well positioned OPPOSITE the party that was deeply UNPOPULAR.