d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2020 > Trump Vs. Pack O' Dems
Prev1660661662663664983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 8 2020 08:44am
Quote (Goomshill @ 8 Sep 2020 05:59)
https://twitter.com/SeekerOTL/status/1303062174454165505

A rather odd similarity between Jeffrey Goldberg's supposed Trump quote from anonymous sources, and the script of The Godfather II
Now without any other links, that would be just silly coincidence
Except that Jeffrey Goldberg is obsessed with the Godfather movies and has written numerous articles about them and those involved in them, and framed his take on politics through a lens of The Godfather
He contextualized Obama around it, he framed Trump's presidency through it, and he even quoted Obama with direct Godfather quotes he fed him in an interview

Considering the amount of witnesses who have come out on the record denying Goldberg's claim, and the complete lack of evidence he's presented so far, it seems more likely that Goldberg was building upon the bullshit he knows.

also, there's the aspect where even if you believe Goldberg had real sources making this claim, you'd have to explain why a man so obsessed with the godfather movies and who spent years comparing presidents to them, would not make any such comparison or distinction to an almost identical quote he's attributing to President Trump and what Sonny Corleone said in Part II. A rather conspicuous absence.

the author already quasi-retracted. The #fakenews klan always does the same formula, launch some absurd fake story with “anonymous sources” confirming it. and then slowly backtrack the key parts
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Sep 8 2020 09:03am
Quote (fender @ Sep 8 2020 06:49am)
lol, trump re-tweeting someone calling him a bitch. what a very smart president...

https://i.imgur.com/VT8ntRq.jpg


This "military-industrial complex" attack line from Trump is obviously deflection that makes no sense. Trump hasn't ended the endless wars... he could pull us out of Afghanistan tomorrow if he wanted, or the many other conflicts we're participating in. He hasn't. He brags constantly anytime the US sells arms to other nations(like Saudi Arabia). He offered US troops to be essentially mercenaries for Saudi Arabia. He's increased the defense budget.

This is one of those issues where Trump plays both sides... pretending he's an isolationist dove for the rubes who believe it while taking credit for a military buildup.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 8 2020 09:06am
Quote (IceMage @ Sep 8 2020 11:03am)
This "military-industrial complex" attack line from Trump is obviously deflection that makes no sense. Trump hasn't ended the endless wars... he could pull us out of Afghanistan tomorrow if he wanted, or the many other conflicts we're participating in. He hasn't. He brags constantly anytime the US sells arms to other nations(like Saudi Arabia). He offered US troops to be essentially mercenaries for Saudi Arabia. He's increased the defense budget.

This is one of those issues where Trump plays both sides... pretending he's an isolationist dove for the rubes who believe it while taking credit for a military buildup.


It's impossible to 'end' in the literal sense because you have a chorus on both sides calling him irresponsible every time he tries. Trump very clearly tried on multiple occasions to bring troops home from Afghanistan, Syria, Germany only to be called a million names for wanting to do that. Are you really not familiar with this or just ignoring it?

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Sep 8 2020 09:07am
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Sep 8 2020 09:07am
Quote (IceMage @ Sep 8 2020 08:03am)
This "military-industrial complex" attack line from Trump is obviously deflection that makes no sense. Trump hasn't ended the endless wars... he could pull us out of Afghanistan tomorrow if he wanted, or the many other conflicts we're participating in. He hasn't. He brags constantly anytime the US sells arms to other nations(like Saudi Arabia). He offered US troops to be essentially mercenaries for Saudi Arabia. He's increased the defense budget.

This is one of those issues where Trump plays both sides... pretending he's an isolationist dove for the rubes who believe it while taking credit for a military buildup.


Its too bad trump base isn't full of decent people as the fuck face will do ANYTHING to support any idea put forward by his base. He would pimp the 1st lady out for votes
We literally could have everything the middle class needed.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 8 2020 09:09am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 8 2020 10:06am)
It's impossible to 'end' in the literal sense because you have a chorus on both sides calling him irresponsible every time he tries. Trump very clearly tried on multiple occasions to bring troops home from Afghanistan, Syria, Germany only to be called a million names for wanting to do that. Are you really not familiar with this or just ignoring it?


And the arms deals? The offering american troops as mercenaries? His increase of the defense budget?

I thought Trump "told it like it is" and "Wasn't going to be like a normal politician" so why does he care if he's being called irresponsible? The whole point of his presidency is that he was going to do the things the people want even if it's unpopular with the deep state or establishment.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 8 2020 09:11am
Quote (ofthevoid @ 8 Sep 2020 11:06)
It's impossible to 'end' in the literal sense because you have a chorus on both sides calling him irresponsible every time he tries. Trump very clearly tried on multiple occasions to bring troops home from Afghanistan, Syria, Germany only to be called a million names for wanting to do that. Are you really not familiar with this or just ignoring it?

the lefties/media/(D)s/RINOs get mad everytime we dont expand the warfront.

heck they tried to make it out that reducing our troop number in Germany would be “all Putin would need to invade central europe” or some delusional nonsense like that lmao

remember then when our military took out that austere religious scholar murdering terrorist scum back late last year. the media and lefties and rinos were actually hoping WWIII would start!! even the lefties here were cheerleading for another war! this has never been seen before in human history!!

This post was edited by excellence on Sep 8 2020 09:12am
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Sep 8 2020 09:13am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 8 2020 11:06am)
It's impossible to 'end' in the literal sense because you have a chorus on both sides calling him irresponsible every time he tries. Trump very clearly tried on multiple occasions to bring troops home from Afghanistan, Syria, Germany only to be called a million names for wanting to do that. Are you really not familiar with this or just ignoring it?


He faces political pushback when he tries to end wars... so what? He faces pushback for many things and proceeds anyway. Who was out there applauding him for the trade war? His propagandists in the media would love if he pulled out of Afghanistan... his voters would love it too.

Is it wrong to expect Trump to be courageous in favor of the troops? We're supposed to shrug our shoulders when he continues these endless wars because Lindsey Graham would get angry for a week?

Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 8 2020 09:14am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 8 2020 11:09am)
And the arms deals? The offering american troops as mercenaries? His increase of the defense budget?

I thought Trump "told it like it is" and "Wasn't going to be like a normal politician" so why does he care if he's being called irresponsible? The whole point of his presidency is that he was going to do the things the people want even if it's unpopular with the deep state or establishment.


Selling arms and bringing troops home aren't mutually exclusive things which if you do one then you can't do the other. It's entirely possible to sell guns and want to end US involvement in wars.

If you look at this from a lens of economics, which i would say it's the one that Trump uses, selling guns is a net good for the US (billions coming in), bringing the troops home also net good with hundreds of millions being saved in military costs.

Quote (IceMage @ Sep 8 2020 11:13am)
He faces political pushback when he tries to end wars... so what? He faces pushback for many things and proceeds anyway. Who was out there applauding him for the trade war? His propagandists in the media would love if he pulled out of Afghanistan... his voters would love it too.

Is it wrong to expect Trump to be courageous in favor of the troops? We're supposed to shrug our shoulders when he continues these endless wars because Lindsey Graham would get angry for a week?


He has made significant strides to bring them hope. If your criticism is he hasn't brought all of them home therefore he isn't true to that ideology then that's a really dumb take. The world isn't binary, all or nothing.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-is-determined-to-bring-home-us-military-forces-from-somewhere/2020/07/20/c2664fb8-c851-11ea-b037-f9711f89ee46_story.html





This post was edited by ofthevoid on Sep 8 2020 09:18am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 8 2020 09:18am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 8 2020 10:14am)
Selling arms and bringing troops home aren't mutually exclusive things which if you do one then you can't do the other. It's entirely possible to sell guns and want to end US involvement in wars.

If you look at this from a lens of economics, which i would say it's the one that Trump uses, selling guns is a net good for the US (billions coming in), bringing the troops home also net good with hundreds of millions being saved in military costs.


You're shifting from the point. Those things undeniably support the military industrial complex. The "economic lens" is exactly that, supporting the influence of the military industrial complex.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 8 2020 09:24am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 8 2020 11:18am)
You're shifting from the point. Those things undeniably support the military industrial complex. The "economic lens" is exactly that, supporting the influence of the military industrial complex.


You're confused. The economic lens here would be to not provide free policing for the world, which he repeatedly spoke on. It's not economical for the US to have large standing armies all across the globe. It is economical to not have those armies and basically just profiteer by selling the Saudis or whomever guns.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Sep 8 2020 09:25am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1660661662663664983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll