d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev16526536546556563169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Aug 9 2016 04:14pm
Quote (majorblood @ Aug 9 2016 04:52pm)


LOL

He has to have a team of guys to make up apologetic tweets every time he makes a speech. I hope they're being paid by commission and not hourly!
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Aug 9 2016 04:18pm
I think it was a hilarious quip and it would be fully justified.

Cowardly progressives more worried about an insinuation that someone may want to shoot Hillary than the open contempt she has for the rights in the constitution.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Aug 9 2016 04:20pm
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Aug 9 2016 04:27pm
After the daily ridiculous statement by Trump let me go ahead and answer for the republicans

We don't condone ridiculous statement #52945 and we aren't ready to endorse but things are still looking good and moving forward
Member
Posts: 38,317
Joined: Jul 12 2006
Gold: 20.31
Aug 9 2016 04:32pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Aug 9 2016 03:27pm)
After the daily ridiculous statement by Trump let me go ahead and answer for the republicans

We don't condone ridiculous statement #52945 and we aren't ready to endorse but things are still looking good and moving forward


Needs only a slight adjustment: they still support him and will vote for him, but don't "endorse" him. That's a critical piece of it for most of their Senate candidates.

Quote (cambovenzi @ Aug 9 2016 03:18pm)
I think it was a hilarious quip and it would be fully justified.

Cowardly progressives more worried about an insinuation that someone may want to shoot Hillary than the open contempt she has for the rights in the constitution.


Well then I guess it's a good thing that Clinton, in reality, doesn't have contempt for any part of the Constitution.

This post was edited by Pollster on Aug 9 2016 04:33pm
Member
Posts: 50,945
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Aug 9 2016 05:07pm
Quote (Pollster @ Aug 9 2016 04:32pm)
Well then I guess it's a good thing that Clinton, in reality, doesn't have contempt for any part of the Constitution.


Really? She has no contempt for Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3?
Well we already know she's all about the 1, 2, 3 strikes you're out laws so small wonder
Member
Posts: 54,796
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,838.83
Aug 9 2016 06:06pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Aug 9 2016 02:18pm)
I think it was a hilarious quip and it would be fully justified.

Cowardly progressives more worried about an insinuation that someone may want to shoot Hillary than the open contempt she has for the rights in the constitution.


any way people try to spin it trump is right. The second amendment is literally meant to stop tyrannical government and if Hillary wants to infringe on those rights a rebellion is justified by the constitution.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Aug 9 2016 06:10pm
Quote (majorblood @ Aug 9 2016 04:06pm)
any way people try to spin it trump is right. The second amendment is literally meant to stop tyrannical government and if Hillary wants to infringe on those rights a rebellion is justified by the constitution.


and there we have it

7/10 trump supporters think the system is rigged and now daddy is calling to grab the guns and pitchforks if hillary is elected

dangerous rhetoric that will once again be shrugged off as a joke but will add to the growing anger that is gonna explode when Trump loses
Member
Posts: 54,796
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,838.83
Aug 9 2016 06:30pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Aug 9 2016 04:10pm)
and there we have it

7/10 trump supporters think the system is rigged and now daddy is calling to grab the guns and pitchforks if hillary is elected

dangerous rhetoric that will once again be shrugged off as a joke but will add to the growing anger that is gonna explode when Trump loses


Not even sure what you are talking about. If Hillary wants to infringe on the second amendment she is going against the constitution. I'm not calling for guns and pitchforks if someone is elected, i'm saying the people have the constitutional right to bear arms which the founding fathers believe are to be used in many ways including resisting a tyrannical government that wishes to infringe on said rights.

This post was edited by majorblood on Aug 9 2016 06:30pm
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Aug 9 2016 06:34pm
Quote (majorblood @ Aug 9 2016 04:30pm)
Not even sure what you are talking about. If Hillary wants to infringe on the second amendment she is going against the constitution. I'm not calling for guns and pitchforks if someone is elected, i'm saying the people have the constitutional right to bear arms which the founding fathers believe are to be used in many ways including resisting an tyrannical government that wishes to infringe on said rights.


Nobody is going to take 300 million guns or attempt to

Trump is manipulating dumb and armed supporters that are already angry to believe that the system is corrupt and the election will be stolen and their beloved guns are at risk
Member
Posts: 33,929
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Aug 9 2016 07:23pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Aug 9 2016 08:34pm)
Nobody is going to take 300 million guns or attempt to

Trump is manipulating dumb and armed supporters that are already angry to believe that the system is corrupt and the election will be stolen and their beloved guns are at risk


I used to think that way when I was a naive 17 year old.

The corruption is pretty obvious now.

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Aug 9 2016 07:23pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev16526536546556563169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll