Quote (Pollster @ Aug 9 2016 01:18pm)
And we have laws in this country that allow people to have an opinion and speak it;
And just as Mr Sharia Law over there had the right to his opinions on gays and to spread it to his son (as long as it didn't rise to the very high bar required for incitement), Hillary Clinton has the freedom to disavow him.
Theres no law that requires the HRC campaign to play chum to a mass murderer's pappy who taught him the ways of the world ISIS-style.
This week Hillary called the grieving parents of a slain serviceman liars and disrespected them on national TV, and sat the homophobic inspiration for america's worst mass shooting a few feet behind her at a political rally, and didn't walk back either
And the media moved on without it reaching the front page, just a brief cursory footnote and fughetaboutit
meanwhile trump said "I'd like to hear what {Mrs Khan} had to say" and asked if her husband's speech was written by the HRC campaign, which it was, and got a full week of pillory with front page stories and backlash everywhere
Quote (Pollster @ Aug 9 2016 02:03pm)
The shooter had as much of an affiliation with Black Lives Matter as you do, he was just a mentally-ill war veteran.
yeah just like how when a muslim screams "ALLAHU AKBHAR" and makes a video pledging his life to ISIS prior to his terrorist attack, he's not a real muslim and didn't have anything to do with islam
The shooter in texas was at a black lives matter really, explicitly shouted his motivations when he was cornered: The killings of alton sterling and philando castile
Which is another way in which the irresponsible media got people killed
This post was edited by Goomshill on Aug 9 2016 02:06pm