Even some of the biggest government politicians, judges and private-union supporters in our history understood some major problems of government unions:
Quote
"Meticulous attention should be paid to the special relations and obligations of public servants to the public itself and to the Government....The process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service."
a "strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to obstruct the operations of government until their demands are satisfied. Such action looking toward the paralysis of government by those who have sworn to support it is unthinkable and intolerable."
-FDR
Quote
"To tolerate or recognize any combination of civil service employees of the government as a labor organization or union is not only incompatible with the spirit of democracy, but inconsistent with every principle upon which our government is founded. Nothing is more dangerous to public welfare than to admit that hired servants of the State can dictate to the government the hours, the wages and conditions under which they will carry on essential services vital to the welfare, safety, and security of the citizen. To admit as true that government employees have power to halt or check the functions of government unless their demands are satisfied, is to transfer to them all legislative, executive and judicial power. Nothing would be more ridiculous."
- NY Supreme court judge, 1943
Quote
THE PUBLIC-SECTOR DIFFERENCE
When it comes to advancing their interests, public-sector unions have significant advantages over traditional unions. For one thing, using the political process, they can exert far greater influence over their members' employers — that is, government — than private-sector unions can. Through their extensive political activity, these government-workers' unions help elect the very politicians who will act as "management" in their contract negotiations — in effect handpicking those who will sit across the bargaining table from them, in a way that workers in a private corporation (like, say, American Airlines or the Washington Post Company) cannot. Such power led Victor Gotbaum, the leader of District Council 37 of the AFSCME in New York City, to brag in 1975: "We have the ability, in a sense, to elect our own boss."
http://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-trouble-with-public-sector-unions
Quote (riskoffeudalism)
I've been reading your posts for years. I understand exactly what fantasy land nonsense you support and what the actual outcomes of your policies would be. The endgame of your dystopia is feudalism.
I advocate for government protecting the rights of individuals.
You advocate for the protection of powerful organizations. You can lie all day and pretend you care about individual rights and liberties but allowing corporations and and the wealthy elite free reign is in direct opposition of individual rights. I imagine your child like mind looks at "government privileged elite" and "wealth privileged elite" and thinks they must be completely different.
You're the guy who wants to paint sweatshop owners as saints, say chaining children to sewing machines for 20 hours a day is good for them. You're incapable of understanding that creating an environment of oppression and coercion then calling people's actions within that environment voluntary is insane.
You keep lying and pretending you care about individual rights for more than a few individuals, you and your ideology are always going to be a fringe lunatic joke.
Trying to see how many lies you can fit into one post?