d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2020 > Trump Vs. Pack O' Dems
Prev1642643644645646983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Aug 29 2020 10:36am
Quote (theCrossbones @ Aug 29 2020 12:29pm)
so then you R should tell everyone your plan is to remove the 3 meals a say and give them a slice of cold ham. and stop the bs lying about it.
Do you want to provide the service or not?


There's no easy answer here and the conversation has to be had in a honest sober tone, not faggot emotional arguments where just bringing up the grown up conversation you're called someone that wants to kill old people.

Pull up a chart of medicare/medicaid/ss spend graph over last years and future projections. At some point this is going to start to crowd out other spend, like infrastructure, like military, like schools, and so on.

Personally i'm okay with cutting down on the military spend but that wont be enough in the long term. There is a inherent limit on what we spend money on, you can't have everything, if you keep one thing that's not sustainable, ultimately something else will suffer.
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Aug 29 2020 10:40am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Aug 29 2020 09:36am)
There's no easy answer here and the conversation has to be had in a honest sober tone, not faggot emotional arguments where just bringing up the grown up conversation you're called someone that wants to kill old people.

Pull up a chart of medicare/medicaid/ss spend graph over last years and future projections. At some point this is going to start to crowd out other spend, like infrastructure, like military, like schools, and so on.

Personally i'm okay with cutting down on the military spend but that wont be enough in the long term. There is a inherent limit on what we spend money on, you can't have everything, if you keep one thing that's not sustainable, ultimately something else will suffer.


i'm using your 3 meals a day story.. don't get freaked out, this is your idea.. LOL
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Aug 29 2020 10:49am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Aug 29 2020 11:29am)
The spend is the income for those people. The programs need to be capped in what they cover and to what extent, that's the real issue here. Science moving at light speed and finding ways to keep people alive longer and longer is a double edge sword here. Yes it's a positive but simultaneously these services are extremely expensive, more so when it's not just one or two procedure but span months, years, decades.

For most of history a 80 year old getting an infection and dying was accepted for society. Today, we have the science and the resources to keep that person in the hospital for a month for them to recover and live for another year or two, at the cost of tens if not hundreds of thousands. Not saying don't treat these people but at some point we have to have the tough talk as a society and come to the understanding that the current model threatens the whole house of cards if something isn't done.


You keep bringing up generalities because you cant point to any tangible effort by Republicans to actually reform these programs.
Member
Posts: 20,253
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 5,267.97
Aug 29 2020 11:29am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Aug 29 2020 06:49pm)
You keep bringing up generalities because you cant point to any tangible effort by Republicans to actually reform these programs.


Not to mention that social welfare problems are somehow not affordable, despite the fact that they've successfully led to an immense increase in quality of life all over the civilized world.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Aug 29 2020 11:31am
Quote (Leevee @ Aug 29 2020 12:29pm)
Not to mention that social welfare problems are somehow not affordable, despite the fact that they've successfully led to an immense increase in quality of life all over the civilized world.


Yeah, it's just another version of "WE CAN'T AFFORD THINGS THAT EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD DOES!" because the corporate overlords don't want it.
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Aug 29 2020 12:01pm
Quote (Leevee @ Aug 29 2020 01:29pm)
Not to mention that social welfare problems are somehow not affordable, despite the fact that they've successfully led to an immense increase in quality of life all over the civilized world.



Europe has different demographics. There is a reason why kenya still doesnt have clean water.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Aug 29 2020 12:03pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Aug 29 2020 12:49pm)
You keep bringing up generalities because you cant point to any tangible effort by Republicans to actually reform these programs.



Spend less or change it. It’s that simple, that’s the solution. I can keep repeating this over and over but you and half of the country refuse to hear it. That’s been the republican message for quite a while.

And there have been numerous attempts to putting this into policy. Ryan tried, others have as well do some research.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Aug 29 2020 12:07pm
Member
Posts: 20,253
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 5,267.97
Aug 29 2020 12:05pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Aug 29 2020 07:31pm)
Yeah, it's just another version of "WE CAN'T AFFORD THINGS THAT EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD DOES!" because the corporate overlords don't want it.


And once he sees us making this point, he'll resort to:

* "But look at those waiting lines for doctors!" because someone on the internet told him that this is a problem.
* "But people will become freeloaders!" because apparently socially democratic countries have higher unemployment rates than the USA.
* "But those people all have a degree and the degree becomes useless!" because apparently a the purpose of a college degree is to make someone feel special, instead of to prepare people for the job market.
* "But eventually you run out of other people's money to spend!" because apparently education and health-care are cheaper in a free market than when regulated as basic necessities.
* "But the free market leads to innovation, and if you don't like that you should stop using the internet!" because apparently NASA and other government sponsored corporations are not responsible for 90% of the technological advancements that the USA made in the 20th century.

I hope I have saved ofthevoid some time by making these points for him.

This post was edited by Leevee on Aug 29 2020 12:05pm
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Aug 29 2020 12:32pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Aug 29 2020 12:49pm)
You keep bringing up generalities because you cant point to any tangible effort by Republicans to actually reform these programs.



Abolish social security and employer healthcare mandates
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Aug 29 2020 12:40pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Aug 29 2020 01:32pm)
Abolish social security and employer healthcare mandates


Abolishing employer health mandates won't make any meaningful change, and will likely just make insurance more expensive as the people will lose collective bargaining power. Without a real public option employers negotiating for health insurance is probably the next best thing. The only thing that will reasonably bring down healthcare costs, besides removing the for-profit middle men, would be collectively bargaining prices.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1642643644645646983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll