d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Elon Musk Now Twitter's Big Shareholder
Prev16364656667113Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 92,928
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 8 2022 02:04pm
Quote (Djunior @ Nov 8 2022 03:00pm)
Damages to one's person for example

It doesn't have to be financial damage that you can show proof of


u said it was damages against twitter, twitter is a person now?

so you think impersonators should be charged with causing emotional distress to a company?

i think you're starting to realize your ideas dont work on paper at all, you're all over the place.
Member
Posts: 15,935
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Nov 8 2022 02:08pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 8 2022 09:04pm)
u said it was damages against twitter, twitter is a person now?

so you think impersonators should be charged with causing emotional distress to a company?

i think you're starting to realize your ideas dont work on paper at all, you're all over the place.


I'm referring to the person impersonating Musk saying he drinks his own urine.

Once again do I need to quote myself to refresh your memory?

Clearly this isn't causing financial damage but it's causing damage to his person.

You seem to be the one that's confused buddy
Member
Posts: 16,040
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Nov 8 2022 02:10pm
Quote (fender @ Nov 9 2022 07:24am)
turns out the self-proclaimed "free speech absolutist" is just another whiny snowflake who's happy to censor any speech he doesn't like (while "freeing" anti-semitism, racism, and blatant misinformation)... who would have thought?!

https://i.imgur.com/OPuUDkP.jpeg


I guess leftoids don't know a difference between humour and straight lies.

Their favourite humour is very blunt sarcasm which is a mascarade for insults and just being human garbage. They don't know how to deliver a funny joke but think if they slander someone it's funny. Deep inside they are devoid of empathy.

Just picture them in front of a mirror attempting a joke. "you are a piece of shit and I hate you..... Long pause...... NOT!"
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Nov 8 2022 02:15pm
the right's definition of free speech "absolutism"


*making crude jokes about tech daddy snowflake*: "illegal, should be in prison, it's a crime, it hurts his precious feelings, should be censored, that's hacking, silence them immediately, my pearls!!!1!"

anti-semitism, n-word usage, death threat: *crickets*
Member
Posts: 92,928
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 8 2022 02:15pm
Quote (Djunior @ Nov 8 2022 03:08pm)
I'm referring to the person impersonating Musk saying he drinks his own urine.

Once again do I need to quote myself to refresh your memory?

Clearly this isn't causing financial damage but it's causing damage to his person.

You seem to be the one that's confused buddy


So you think that Musk should sue for emotional distress? because if you're claiming emotional distress in the same position as "go to the courts" that means musk personally has to sue them.
Member
Posts: 15,935
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Nov 8 2022 02:23pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 8 2022 09:15pm)
So you think that Musk should sue for emotional distress? because if you're claiming emotional distress in the same position as "go to the courts" that means musk personally has to sue them.


Musk most likely is happy just banning them. EZ and he's the last one laughing

But clearly a bunch of those imposters have the intention to harm him and the platform

Other example, twitter is getting bad press because a small number of accounts have been pumping out thousands of tweets containing racial slurs / n word etc

Twitter loses add revenue etc
Member
Posts: 15,935
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Nov 8 2022 02:29pm
Quote (fender @ Nov 8 2022 09:15pm)
the right's definition of free speech "absolutism"


*making crude jokes about tech daddy snowflake*: "illegal, should be in prison, it's a crime, it hurts his precious feelings, should be censored, that's hacking, silence them immediately, my pearls!!!1!"

anti-semitism, n-word usage, death threat: *crickets*


Already replied to that 20 odd pages back but here you go, lol

Sore far left "progressives" pumping out harmful tweets cause they're losing their shit xD




Member
Posts: 16,040
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Nov 8 2022 02:34pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 9 2022 09:04am)
u said it was damages against twitter, twitter is a person now?

so you think impersonators should be charged with causing emotional distress to a company?

i think you're starting to realize your ideas dont work on paper at all, you're all over the place.


FYI not all laws are based on damages but perceived. Attempted murder carries intentions to do harm, not driving at certain speed limit even though you don't cause harm to anyone is also an offence as examples.
Derogatory comments like musk drinking his own piss without explicit joke/parody warning and impersonating him to manipulate elections is akin to a local newspaper saying Joe biden revealed he likes to drink his own piss and secretly would like Trump to come back into office. There are millions of eyeballs who would see that and has impact.
If someone catches wind let's say Kathy decides to con people into believing that musk is a kiddy fiddler that will impact his Tesla sales and will drive certain users away from the Twitter platform. Losing customers creates financial burden.

I mean you laugh at Alex Jones like a degenerate but in the same breath peddle lies for Kathy like she is different and all of a sudden same laws don't apply is a deplorable human trait. That will be $1billion please.

A congregation of leftoids are using these cheap tactics to bring others down. They are not attacking musk and the platform on legit and valid reasons so they instead make them up as they go along. I guess they been doing that on a mass scale and only further cements their own characters as snowflakes

This post was edited by addone on Nov 8 2022 02:41pm
Member
Posts: 92,928
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 8 2022 02:39pm
Quote (Djunior @ Nov 8 2022 03:23pm)
Musk most likely is happy just banning them. EZ and he's the last one laughing

But clearly a bunch of those imposters have the intention to harm him and the platform

Other example, twitter is getting bad press because a small number of accounts have been pumping out thousands of tweets containing racial slurs / n word etc

Twitter loses add revenue etc


so to round it out your opinion is that Musk should sue people (you said it should go to courts and we've now established that means musk has to sue them) even though musk doesnt want to.

happy we cleared that up.

Quote (addone @ Nov 8 2022 03:34pm)
FYI not all laws are based on damages but perceived. Attempted murder carries intentions to do harm, not driving at certain speed limit even though you don't cause harm to anyone is also an offence as examples.
Derogatory comments like musk drinking his own piss without explicit joke/parody warning and impersonating him to manipulate elections is akin to a local newspaper saying Joe biden revealed he likes to drink his own piss and secretly would like Trump to come back into office. There are millions of eyeballs who would see that and has impact.
If someone catches wind let's say Kathy decides to con people into believing that musk is a kiddy fiddler that will impact his Tesla sales and will drive certain users away from the Twitter platform. Losing customers creates financial burden.

I mean you laugh at Alex Jones like a degenerate but in the same breath peddle lies for Kathy like she is different and all of a sudden same laws don't apply is a deplorable human trait. That will be $1billion please.


i laughed at Jones, and at the same time disagreed with the judgement against him.

courts getting involved in social media posts is a terrible idea, and its a can of worms you'll never be able to close. you're shortsighted, prosecute kathy griffin and 10 years later you'll see sitting politicians put in prison for tweets, mark my words. just ban them for their stupid posts, dont regulate social media companies, its a terrible idea.
Member
Posts: 15,935
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Nov 8 2022 02:49pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 8 2022 09:39pm)
so to round it out your opinion is that Musk should sue people (you said it should go to courts and we've now established that means musk has to sue them) even though musk doesnt want to.

happy we cleared that up.


I think he can.

For now his statement shows he's happy banning them (users need to state it's parody)

If they carry on I'd say Musk will step it up
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev16364656667113Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll