Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 21 2020 03:31pm)

do we need to arrange the PARD Ironman we were supposed to hold 4 years ago? I think Linny's permission didn't get used up that time around
I've already called dibs on a summon necromancer to represent the democrat's mail-in vote

Quote (Djunior @ Oct 21 2020 03:25pm)

The email showing that his son set up a meeting is there, let's wait and see what other juicy emails they shake out of this laptop eh

To be continued

Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 21 2020 01:13am)

Yeah what really makes it amazing is that Rudy was holding onto child porn of Joe Biden's granddaughter, and pics with her posing suggestively with her uncle
Its this entire scandal supposed to just disappear by screaming 'qanon' and 'russia'? He was texting Joe Biden about how he was being sexually inappropriate with his niece.


Whats supposed to happen when Joe Biden is elected in two weeks? Do we have 4 years where the media refuses to print any stories investigating Hunter Biden / Burisma, and social media continuing to censor people posting about it and lock out newspapers that do look into it? How long can that be sustained?

Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 21 2020 12:49pm)

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1318975230119940103
he's right I guess
Lets see which media outlets hold to their sincere convictions they cited in the Rep. Katie Hill scandal
Although somehow "leaked images of cheating on your husband with a female subordinate on your payroll" don't seem quite equal to "being seduced by a 24 year old actress in a prank"

Still, posting pics of someone in a sexually compromised position that were obtained maliciously, without any wrongdoing on their part- would actually be considered criminal revenge porn in many jurisdictions thanks to these new laws passed in the last few years.

/e for example:
https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1318994305411911681

Quote (thundercock @ Oct 21 2020 02:51pm)

I imagine so since quite a bit of it (if not all) is bullshit. I'm sure some fringe folks will believe it just like 9/11 conspiracy theories but the general public isn't going to be aware or care. Large accusations require an abundance of evidence and no credible organization is going to talk about the story unless that evidence exists. I mean, that's the way things SHOULD work right?

As for censorship, I think we're still in the process of determining where that line should be. Social media has been weaponized and will continue to be weaponized. You've seen how riots can start just by tweeting "black guy shot by cops." In an ideal world, we would have zero censorship. However, people can't seem to determine fact from fiction which is why we have such strong reactions.

Quote (Djunior @ Oct 21 2020 02:43pm)

LOL

I think I remember you from threads in LLD sub, you were accused many times of buying items for cash and you always said shit like I prefer buying them instead of having to farm them legit

LLDpk attempted to be legit guild and GM LLDers you fuckhead, it's people like YOU who are shit and ruined the game

I joined LLDpk right after I joined that was 2010 and within a few years the dueling scene was fucked because of imported items and dupes and hybrids

Yeah nice IQ there buddy

Quote (Surfpunk @ Oct 21 2020 02:42pm)

I mean, these people didn't let a little thing like money laundering get in their way of voting for him in 2016, why would they change their minds now? Other presidential candidacies have been sunk for FAR, FAR less (Howard Dean YEEEAAAAAH!!!!, anyone)? But Trump? Anyone who doesn't support him must be a Biden cuck. LOL. Shills gonna keep on shilling.

https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-fines-trump-taj-mahal-casino-resort-10-million-significant-and-long

Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 21 2020 03:56pm)

U remember wrong, i was one of the people who called your guild leader break a donor dog along with all of the rest.

i bought 1 eth rep grim off of c-food and thats it, never had any items rolled.

i started buying fg just so i don't have to clear my inbox, i dont need fg, no one has the items i want. and i already have every build there is done and sitting.


edit: still running from ur bad assumption im a biden cuck tho, and focusing on LLD talk 1 post after saying I was using it to deflect.

figures.



yup is funny to think Head got taken down by that one single moment.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 21 2020 10:11am)

How people respond to allegations I think is pretty important. A person accused of such heinous shit that's not guilty is going to feel really angry and is probably going to foam at his mouth, I know that's what I would do. Like look at someone like Kavanaugh, you could see the anger in his eyes. Maybe it was a staged response but that wounded look in the face of damaging lies comes across both in your voice and through the screen.

A guilty person might try this approach but if they are guilty and they know there's some evidence that could expose them as lying they'll just sit quietly in the corner.

I don't know if this laptop pedo shit is real, but if it's not why isn't Hunter or Biden threatening to go after all of these media outlets with lawsuits? I mean I feel like this would be the proper response from someone that's not guilty. Why at least not issue public statements where they categorically deny all of this?

Quote (thundercock @ Oct 21 2020 03:51pm)

I imagine so since quite a bit of it (if not all) is bullshit. .

Quote (thundercock @ Oct 21 2020 04:07pm)

This doesn't make sense. Some accusations are so outlandish that you just ignore them. Do you think the Queen of England responds to everything in the National Enquirer? Of course not.

Quote (thundercock @ Oct 21 2020 02:51pm)

I do not see Rudy's dick so it's not revenge porn.

Quote

1. A person is guilty of unlawful dissemination or publication of an intimate image when:
(a) with intent to cause harm to the emotional, financial or physical welfare of another person, he or she intentionally disseminates or publishes a still or video image of such other person, who is identifiable from the still or video image itself or from information displayed in connection with the still or video image, without such other person's consent, which depicts:
(i) an unclothed or exposed intimate part of such other person; or
(ii) such other person engaging in sexual conduct as defined in subdivision ten of section 130.00 of this chapter with another person; and
(b) such still or video image was taken under circumstances when the person depicted had a reasonable expectation that the image would remain private and the actor knew or reasonably should have known the person depicted intended for the still or video image to remain private, regardless of whether the actor was present when the still or video image was taken.
2. For purposes of this section "intimate part" means the naked genitals, pubic area, anus or female nipple of the person.
2-a. For purposes of this section "disseminate" and "publish" shall have the same meaning as defined in section 250.40 of this title.
3. This section shall not apply to the following:
(a) the reporting of unlawful conduct;
(b) dissemination or publication of an intimate image made during lawful and common practices of law enforcement, legal proceedings or medical treatment;
(c) images involving voluntary exposure in a public or commercial setting; or
(d) dissemination or publication of an intimate image made for a legitimate public purpose.
4. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit, or to enlarge, the protections that 47 U.S.C § 230 confers on an interactive computer service for content provided by another information content provider, as such terms are defined in 47 U.S.C. § 230.
Unlawful dissemination or publication of an intimate image is a class A misdemeanor.

Quote

"Sexual conduct" means sexual intercourse, oral sexual conduct,
anal sexual conduct, aggravated sexual contact, or sexual contact.