Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 5 2021 09:54am)
Oh please, this type of vulgar libertarianism is ridiculous, and I know that you're too smart to actually have such a simplistic worldview. Also, you know full well that IQ and all other forms of talent are not distributed evenly, that some folks just don't have what it takes to do certain jobs. It just isn't feasible to retrain your typical coal miner or truck driver into an engineer or a programmer.
No, I would of course not take these people into my country. What I care about is fostering a fair, free, stable and peaceful society in my own country as a first step, then also in countries which are similar to it as a second step. Call me a "first world supremacist" if you like. This requires stopping the working- and lower middle classes from bleeding out, from getting fucked by predatory globalist policies for the benefit of the top 0.1%. Pitting the domestic low-qualification people against cheaper competition from abroad, either via mass immigration or via mass outsourcing of their jobs to low wage countries, destabilizes society and mostly serves to enrich the capital owners of the large multinational corporations.
To put it short, I am against zero-sum policies which intentionally seek to increase the global wealth and wage entropy without providing an actual benefit to our society. No, corporations having to pay lower wages is not automatically a benefit to our society... not when the drawback is higher unemployment, a lower wage ratio (share of wages among GDP), less tax revenue or depressed wage gains in high-demand fields - all just so that a few greedy guys at the top can rake in higher profits and some privileged workers like you and me who have well-paying jobs can save a dollar on the pool boy's or housecleaner's wage.
Well, seems like there's some socialism and some nationalism permeating my worldview. Guess I am a German after all. :santa:
It's not "vulgar libertarianism," it's the reality of the world that we live in. It's not an IQ issue and I'm not saying that they need to all work for Google. I'm saying that the supply of Americans should match the demand for jobs in America which means you need to constantly reevaluate your career prospects. That means that a coal miner should be retrained to install solar panels or a truck driver delivers food via Postmates. I guess I don't have much sympathy because I CONSTANTLY have to learn new skills, new tools, etc. If I don't, I'll be fired. Adapt or be left behind. Technology just moves too fast to be complacent.
It's an economic fact that the primary beneficiaries of globalism are the lower and middle class in first world countries. Due to cheap labor, they have access to goods that they wouldn't have had access to otherwise. Will some members of those two classes be fucked? Yes, and we should have policies that retrain these people. But in aggregate, they benefit the most.