they won't admit to it..but the way they react when the pope is around is pretty telling.

do astro priest have cool hats and robes or what? i'm not gonna worship some lab coat jockey.

well if this is light worship does that mean there are sects for different wavelengths? are prisms and lenses considered holy items? cameras are stealing my soul and stuff?

i think they have something called the black cube they wear as a symbol of the indocrination, sometimes they wear black robes too

they talk about it here

http://www.nicholson1968.com/nicholson1968s-post/saturn-worshipthe-black-cube



Also its not light worship, its specifically the bringer of light.

Are you starting to see why it two sides of the same coin yet?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 3 2016 01:20am

so the other side of coin earth is full of bringer of the dark worshipers? probably idolize mercury for holding off the sun all these years.

That's just his other name, the other side is just thinking you made the opposite choice.
You just thinking there are just two choices when really they are the same choice makes it clear you refuse to see there are other choices.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 3 2016 01:39am

Why was this never responded to?

First, Can you show me a picture/video of this experiment or the device that measured this gravity?

In the meantime can you imagine there is no gravity and explain why objects in water rise and lower depending on the pressure of the volume they exist in?



This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 3 2016 03:01am

I would just like to answer the question, thank you.

If you cant answer mine, nor provide what i asked for, i see no reason to oblige you.

according to the reasoning of this video if you were outside of the atmosphere you would no longer be under the pressure of our atmosphere and there would be no downwards force on you? Am I understanding this correctly? He seems to believe that the force we call gravity is actually the force caused from the atmosphere pressing down on us.

There's this convention in conversations: if I ask you a question first, then you answer my question first. Exceptions are possible when my answer to your question will make your answer to my question easier to understand. Since your question is entirely unrelated to mine, this does not apply to the current conversation. In case your question is relevant, and its relevance simply goes over my head, then you will have to explain why it is relevant -- in other words -- why I should go out of my way to answer your question before you answer my question.

I'll gladly respond to your post if you respond to mine. So far, I can only assume that you are bringing up side-questions and Youtube videos to distract me from my own question, and therefore avoid having to answer it. I see through this, and I will not fall for it.

If you are interested in continuing a conversation with me, then feel free to do so by actually contributing to the conversation the way people typically contribute to conversations: answer my question, then ask a question of your own.



This is an observation I couldn't help making as well. This person in particular isn't denying gravity -- he's just giving it a different label. If you claim gravity does not exist, you can't talk about "air pressing down on us" without offering an explanation as to why it presses down on us.

This post was edited by Leevee on Nov 3 2016 04:08am