how often do you think about my sex life? just a rhetorical question.

you are very mad, what is the reason? abortion is murder.

Rofl at democrats crying about constitutionality.

Even if only one more baby is born into this world and can enjoy life just like you and I as a result of this law it's a great positive.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Sep 2 2021 05:47pm

The right to punch women in the uterus seems to be a salient issue for you.



That's because the fetus cannot survive without the mother. The pregnant woman's bodily autonomy gives her a right to end this life form which is not a fully developed human yet and which could not develop into independent human life without her. The murderer does not have the right to make this decision about the potential life.

You've got a point, however. If a society distinguishes between potential human life (embryos or early stage fetuses) and fully developed, independent human life (newborns or third trimester fetuses), then the killing of a not yet viable fetus in the body of a pregnant woman should carry a lower sentence and not be legally put on the same level as the murder of an alive human.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 2 2021 05:49pm

"Even if only just a single covid death can be prevented as a result of lockdowns and mask-wearing it's a great positive"

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 2 2021 05:50pm

Tyranosaurus rekt

If you think about this for more than 2 seconds, you will come to the conclusion that this is a very dangerous line of thinking.

Not comparable dawg.



I'm fine with it.

It's more than comparable. The argument for preventing Covid deaths is a far stronger moral argument than your abortion argument.

You can literally replace that with dozens of things that cause deaths, that doesn't mean they are comparable. Why not driving or processed foods or alcohol? It's a pointless and retarded gotcha exercise.

Here's a genuine question for you:

If "abortion is murder", then the State should have a similar interest in intervening during the pre-meditation stage similar to how it would intervene if Person A had intent to kill Person B. The State would not simply wait idly by until Person A killed Person B to take action.

If, according to your position, both the mother (Person A) and the fetus (Person B ) constitute a whole person and abortion is murder, then the State should be proactively interfering if/when the mother intends to seek an abortion, right? What would this look like though should your position become enshrined in law?

This post was edited by Handcuffs on Sep 2 2021 06:50pm