Imposters with the intend to do harm should face legal action.

Never dodged or retracted that

Git gud scrub

ok, so let's work this out, dont dodge now.

fill in the blanks, should be easy if you're not just talking out of your butt.

Kathy Griffin said _______, and should be legally liable for _______ $ paid to Elon Musk.

the first part is easy, we can read what she said. so in your perfect world what does she owe Musk? dont dodge.

I never named Griffin

Don't make up shit

Define the harm.

Scrub.

dodge, you said impersonators, she is one of them, and arguably the most high profile.

knew you'd dodge tho, so thanks.

She's an example of the impersonators you're saying should be held legally liable.

FFS, try to keep up.

Actually it does have basis in legality and law.

Go impersonate a government official.

Let us know how it works out in 5-10

In this case damage to the platform, scrub

She didn't say he drinks his own urine which is clearly the example I used

Do I need to quote myself to refresh your memory?

that's like saying shooting a gun at a target range has a basis in illegality because "go shoot a kindergartener and see how that works out".