d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Atheist / Agnostic Thread
Prev16061626364193Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Oct 23 2014 04:42pm
Quote (NatureNames @ Oct 23 2014 01:36pm)
I didn't read anything in this topic but i wanted to comment about the title. It is unfair to group agnostics with atheists. While atheists have more credibility than a religious person, if somebody (an atheist) believes they can definitively know there isn't any god(s), then they are arguably delusional in a similar way as a religious person. Until you unravel the mysteries of the universe, you cant say with certainty that there is no deity of some sort. I'm almost certain there is no gods, but I simply don't know. Nobody knows. Nobody can know. If you think you know, you need to check your facts. The only rational, logical, educated stance to have regarding the existence of deities is agnostic. While some scientists like to carry around the atheist flag or the religious flag, the majority are undeniably agnostic. Agnostic isn't a belief, its just how the cookie crumbles. It's reality.


I don't think anyone (anyone who's thought about it at least) thinks we can prove with 100% certainty that there isn't a God. There's nothing I can know with 100% certainty except that consciousness exists. I still identify as an atheist because I believe God doesn't exist.

I can't prove anyone else exists or that the past exists either, but I'm not agnostic on those issues just because I can't be certain.

This post was edited by Voyaging on Oct 23 2014 04:43pm
Member
Posts: 4,129
Joined: Feb 7 2010
Gold: 0.00
Oct 23 2014 04:58pm
Quote (Scaly @ Oct 23 2014 10:01am)
Found it - http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=71539220&f=27 Starts around post#33 and gets progressively more mental.

One hell of a read into the learned ignorance of people who listen to christian and creationist apologists.

Seriously sick of getting WLC quoted at me.


I read through most of that thread. Fuck you.



This post was edited by Vegerot on Oct 23 2014 04:59pm
Member
Posts: 28,258
Joined: Jan 29 2004
Gold: 2,000.00
Oct 23 2014 09:07pm
Quote (Scaly @ Oct 23 2014 01:01pm)
Found it - http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=71539220&f=27 Starts around post#33 and gets progressively more mental.

One hell of a read into the learned ignorance of people who listen to christian and creationist apologists.

Seriously sick of getting WLC quoted at me.


:thumbsup:

You're stronger than me. I do not have the patience to deal with creationists like that. Most of the time they didn't even bother to read your posts and simply responded with some bs.

Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Oct 23 2014 09:08pm
Quote (2sexy4u @ Oct 23 2014 02:46pm)
Most atheist are actually not 100% sure that God does not exist, so you can consider them to be agnostic. That's why i included both term in title.

Your view about God existence is exact same as me, and most people consider me as a atheist.


You can be an agnostic theist as well.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Oct 23 2014 09:08pm
Quote (dark-soul @ Oct 23 2014 10:07pm)
:thumbsup:

You're stronger than me. I do not have the patience to deal with creationists like that. Most of the time they didn't even bother to read your posts and simply responded with some bs.


you're speaking the wrong language if you're trying to use evidence to convince such people

Quote (BardOfXiix @ Oct 23 2014 10:08pm)
You can be an agnostic theist as well.

not know but believe etc. ?

This post was edited by duffman316 on Oct 23 2014 09:09pm
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Oct 23 2014 09:10pm
Quote (dark-soul @ 24 Oct 2014 03:07)
:thumbsup:

You're stronger than me. I do not have the patience to deal with creationists like that. Most of the time they didn't even bother to read your posts and simply responded with some bs.


Yea... I often wonder if it's not understanding or simply not even listening...

Wilful ignorance pisses me off. So I do what I can to determine if they're being deliberately ignorant, then I call them out on it. If they still won't admit shit then at least they look like an idiot to anyone listening/reading who might otherwise consider their arguments to not be complete bullshit.

In the end it's not just for the person you're arguing with. It's for the audience too.
Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Oct 23 2014 09:23pm
Quote (duffman316 @ Oct 23 2014 08:08pm)
you're speaking the wrong language if you're trying to use evidence to convince such people


not know but believe etc. ?


Yes, belief in x but admitting that it is impossible to be certain x is true. That's a form of agnosticism.
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Oct 23 2014 09:43pm
Quote (BardOfXiix @ 24 Oct 2014 03:23)
Yes, belief in x but admitting that it is impossible to be certain x is true.  That's a form of agnosticism.


Wrote a massive post on this ages ago -

Quote (Vivienne @ 3 Jan 2014 00:12)
Because the very definition of the word is 'without theism' not 'against theism'

Has anyone accused someone who is asexual of not believing sex exists? Someone who is amoral of not believing morals exist? It is possible tthatthey could but it is not a requirement that they do.

Only in atheism is this somehow implied by people. It's ridiculous... and it's only used because people who wish to argue against atheism know that an assertion on the nature of the divine is an indefensible position in any argument. Though somehow they often fail to apply that same logic to the absurdity of claiming that God definitely does exist and not only that but that he is their own particular version of god, Judeo Christian, Dharmic whatever...

Atheism is 'without god'

Antitheism is 'against god'

So when we are talking about belief an atheist is without belief in god, an antitheist is against the idea that god exists and as such believes the opposite.

to be an Atheist it is only a requirement that you be 'without god', that is you make no positive assertions about god's existence in one form or another. You can also be antitheistic, because you are not making a positive assertion on the nature of the divine but only a negative one i.e. 'god does not exist' You can also be agnostic because you are not making a positive assertion on the nature of god, you can still be positive on the situation i.e' I believe a god or gods probably exist' but you cannot make a positive assertion i.e. 'God definitely exists' and still be an atheist.

To be an antitheist it is required that you believe there is no god. That is you make a negative assertion on the nature of the divine i.e. 'God does not exist'.


The word antitheist needs to come into more common usage so this distinction can be made and we don't have to hear the whole 'You can't prove he doesn't exist' shit all the fucking time.

This post was edited by Scaly on Oct 23 2014 09:44pm
Member
Posts: 37,613
Joined: May 3 2007
Gold: 119,903.34
Oct 23 2014 09:49pm
Quote (NatureNames @ Oct 23 2014 12:36pm)
I didn't read anything in this topic but i wanted to comment about the title. It is unfair to group agnostics with atheists. While atheists have more credibility than a religious person, if somebody (an atheist) believes they can definitively know there isn't any god(s), then they are arguably delusional in a similar way as a religious person. Until you unravel the mysteries of the universe, you cant say with certainty that there is no deity of some sort. I'm almost certain there is no gods, but I simply don't know. Nobody knows. Nobody can know. If you think you know, you need to check your facts. The only rational, logical, educated stance to have regarding the existence of deities is agnostic. While some scientists like to carry around the atheist flag or the religious flag, the majority are undeniably agnostic. Agnostic isn't a belief, its just how the cookie crumbles. It's reality.


You can be agnostic and atheist.

Atheism is generally determined by if you have belief a god does or does not exist. Agnosticism is based on whether or not you claim a god does or does not exist.

I'm not sure why people are so hell bent on thinking being atheist means you are claiming god doesn't exist. Some atheists do but the heart of what atheism is not having belief in god/gods which is different than claiming if they do or don't.
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Oct 23 2014 09:56pm
Quote (sir_lance_bb @ 24 Oct 2014 03:49)
You can be agnostic and atheist.

Atheism is generally determined by if you have belief a god does or does not exist. Agnosticism is based on whether or not you claim a god does or does not exist.

I'm not sure why people are so hell bent on thinking being atheist means you are claiming god doesn't exist. Some atheists do but the heart of what atheism is not having belief in god/gods which is different than claiming if they do or don't.


It's because, in my opinion, the religious conflate belief with knowledge. They think they KNOW god exists but they still refer to it as a religious BELIEF. So when we say we don't believe there is a god they take it to mean we know there isn't.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev16061626364193Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll