d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Elon Musk Now Twitter's Big Shareholder
Prev15960616263113Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 92,913
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 8 2022 12:34pm
Quote (Djunior @ Nov 8 2022 01:32pm)
Fucking imposters with the intend to do harm should face legal action.

And I don't care about your fucking stupid opinions either.

Like defund the cops some more, idiots


this is your top used play in the hack playbook.

someone disagrees with you and you just lamely claim they're a BLM card carrying typical woke leftist. you do this all of the time, just as before you falsely assumed we're both super anti elon buying twitter. it makes you look both lazy and unintelligent, now queue you saying u dont care how it makes u look. go ahead, i served it up for you doggie.
Member
Posts: 15,929
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Nov 8 2022 12:34pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 8 2022 07:31pm)
so your opinion can be boiled down to "this thing that is impossible should be possible"

meanwhile clogging up court systems with dumb cases, while we have many areas in the country that have cases against real hardened criminals pushed back 6 months or a year denying victims of actual crimes justice.

yeah putting on a elon musk nametag and saying "i drink my own pee" totally deserves to delay a murder trial in the queue....

no court would touch these "cases" you've dreamed up with a 10 foot pole, your post is about as dumb as any woke idiots idea of "in my mind i envision a world with no guns or crime". it's stupid and not how the world works.


Are you saying defamation lawsuits don't make it to court?
Member
Posts: 3,046
Joined: Oct 1 2021
Gold: 1,979.01
Nov 8 2022 12:35pm
Quote (fender @ Nov 8 2022 11:24am)
turns out the self-proclaimed "free speech absolutist" is just another whiny snowflake who's happy to censor any speech he doesn't like (while "freeing" anti-semitism, racism, and blatant misinformation)... who would have thought?!

https://i.imgur.com/OPuUDkP.jpeg


I agree with Musk in principle. You should be able to express yourself freely, but as yourself. It's currently far too easy to defame, frame, impersonate, slander, because there's no concrete way to prove/disprove the veracity of online user accounts in the world of VPNs, burner emails, bots, etc.

This post was edited by Thebarba on Nov 8 2022 12:36pm
Member
Posts: 15,929
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Nov 8 2022 12:37pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 8 2022 07:34pm)
this is your top used play in the hack playbook.

someone disagrees with you and you just lamely claim they're a BLM card carrying typical woke leftist. you do this all of the time, just as before you falsely assumed we're both super anti elon buying twitter. it makes you look both lazy and unintelligent, now queue you saying u dont care how it makes u look. go ahead, i served it up for you doggie.


My opinions are stupid but another's like defunding the fucking cops FFS can't be called stupid?

FFS man just admit it was the most stupid policy ever, lol
Member
Posts: 92,913
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 8 2022 12:43pm
Quote (Djunior @ Nov 8 2022 01:34pm)
Are you saying defamation lawsuits don't make it to court?


many of them dont, many are thrown out, this would be one of them. you seem confused.

Quote (Djunior @ Nov 8 2022 01:37pm)
My opinions are stupid but another's like defunding the fucking cops FFS can't be called stupid?

FFS man just admit it was the most stupid policy ever, lol


person A had opinions, person B doesn't like person C's opinions, person B tells person A they're stupid for holding person C's opinions.

you're person B. you seem confused.
Member
Posts: 15,929
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Nov 8 2022 12:45pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 8 2022 07:43pm)
many of them dont, many are thrown out, this would be one of them. you seem confused.



person A had opinions, person B doesn't like person C's opinions, person B tells person A they're stupid for holding person C's opinions.

you're person B. you seem confused.


Tons of drawn out defamation lawsuits make it to court. You seem confused, should ask Johnny Depp about it

e: I'm actually person A

I have an opinion, person B doesn't like it

Both SP and you are person B

This post was edited by Djunior on Nov 8 2022 12:50pm
Member
Posts: 92,913
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 8 2022 12:49pm
Quote (Djunior @ Nov 8 2022 01:45pm)
Tons on drawn out defamation lawsuits make it to court. You seem confused, should ask Johnny Depp about it


amber heard and johnny depp had infinitely stronger cases against each other than musk would have against griffin. as a result of their broken marriage and subsequent abuse allegations against each other both were removed from high profile franchises as actors. that's the straight line i was talking about between actions and wallet. you're having an awfully hard time working this out and staying consistent. first it was a legit case, then just like your opinion, now you're back to claiming it's a legit case. because other cases that are entirely unrelated exist lol.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Nov 8 2022 12:50pm
Quote (Mondain @ Nov 8 2022 12:31pm)
If you impersonate staff, you get banned on Every online platform.

How is this even a point of contention.

Dems really got people hysterically doing whatever they want them to do.
At what point are the Democrats no longer a political party and can be finally labeled a terrorist organization.


Yeah. That's a ToS issue, not a legal one.
Member
Posts: 15,929
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Nov 8 2022 12:51pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 8 2022 07:49pm)
amber heard and johnny depp had infinitely stronger cases against each other than musk would have against griffin. as a result of their broken marriage and subsequent abuse allegations against each other both were removed from high profile franchises as actors. that's the straight line i was talking about between actions and wallet. you're having an awfully hard time working this out and staying consistent. first it was a legit case, then just like your opinion, now you're back to claiming it's a legit case. because other cases that are entirely unrelated exist lol.


And you still fucking can't see I said it should

I never said it would be a guarantee now keep dreaming up more stupid shit

gl

This post was edited by Djunior on Nov 8 2022 12:52pm
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Nov 8 2022 12:52pm
Quote (Mondain @ Nov 8 2022 12:31pm)
If you impersonate staff, you get banned on Every online platform.

How is this even a point of contention.

Dems really got people hysterically doing whatever they want them to do.
At what point are the Democrats no longer a political party and can be finally labeled a terrorist organization.


Yeah. That's a ToS issue, not a legal one.
Quote (Djunior @ Nov 8 2022 12:32pm)
Fucking imposters with the intend to do harm should face legal action.

And I don't care about your fucking stupid opinions either.

Like defund the cops some more, idiots


Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15960616263113Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll