Quote (duffman316 @ 10 Sep 2021 10:47)
Yes there are plenty of medical professionals who believe vaccines cause autism etc. But this plenty you speak of is a trivially small minority among a vast majority that are pro vaccine. Just to be clear you're saying this vast majority of the medical community is wrong?
As for the stats you're referring to I don't judge the merits of anti vax arguments because I'm not qualifed to assess the data. If there were credible arguments to be made I'd think the medical community would concur with your findings and I rely on their expertise.
Nobody has made any claims towards vaccines "causing autism". Further, you'd need to cite which "medical professionals" believe this. Are you accusing Jenny McCarthy of being a "medical professional"? If so, I guess Hugh Heffner is a "Professor of Medicine".
As I said, otherwise rational people turn into irate, nonsensical blowhards over a cold. Then claim everyone else should listen to them.
Nobody is anti-vax. Quote me the science, and show me ALL relevant data and studies that indicates anyone who has already gotten and recovered from covid needs or should even consider a vaccine. Because the most recent studies indicate that natural immunity provides 6-13 times the resistance/immunity of the vaccine. Acknowledging the science doesn't make you antivax, it means you're pro-science. Further, science is based on data. So what does the science say about mid to long term effects of mRNA shots? That's right, it says nothing whatsoever, because that data doesn't exist, because there are no phase 4 studies on mRNA vaccines because they've not been in human use until late last year.
Your attempt to rephrase scientific questions into some nonsensical "antivax" argument is trash. And I'm sad to see that Covid has turned you into a science denier.