Quote (excellence @ May 17 2017 05:29pm)
lavar ball lol, helicopter parent on steriods. guy knows how to market though.
knows how to hype. market might be different, his shoe endeavor has been laughed at. and not like the yeezy "lol those look dumb, but im lowkey grabbin a pair" roasting either, he sold under 1000 pairs. granted he's an idiot for not waiting for the draft to just get a shoe deal then and making it hard on himself, but still. he makes for great tv, but he might also be hurting his kids professional development with his shadow, we'll see. him talking to coward though, thats nails on a chalkboard to me.
new topic!
http://nypost.com/2017/05/18/i-stealth-all-the-time-because-it-feels-better-without-a-condom/"stealthing" the act(art?) or removing a condom mid sex. habitual stealther was asked "why do you do it", shockingly he states "it feels better". ARTICLE WORTHY NEWS!
the real topic here is the proper, if any, legal charge for this violation of consent. and what, if any, aggravating factors STI's or an unwanted pregnancy should add.
on one hand it's a blatant violation of consent, on another that consent is somewhat misleading as condoms aren't 100% effective. so there's no objective way to claim "X person took off the condom, and that's why i'm pregnant/got aids/feel icky".