Ukrainian branch of amnesty can't be biased hurr durr

Literally shaking my head here. My God you're dumb. Or easily played, one of the two

Interesting how you won't acknowledge that Russia's targeting of civilian infrastructure started before this latest Ukrainian offensive.

If the rampaging orcs don't want to be characterized as war criminals, they should have staying in their own country.

strawman straight into a goal post move. well done.....

u misunderstood him to mean the ukrainian govt should be able to alter amnesty stats, he says "no that's not what i mean, amnesty in Ukraine should be trusted, u know just like how u said Amnesty was a great organization and should be trusted", and u respond with "ukranian amnesty (the organization i just said was trust worthy compared to the govt) is too biased".

what a sad showing for u.

Wait so amnesty international is only credible if they aren't the ones actually observing the incident?

So which is it? Are they credible or not?

I said right from the start of the argument that Ukraine is one of the two fighting sides. It's only logic that amnesty decides it's not going to involve it's Ukrainian branch to make sure the fighting sides can't simply dismiss the report by pointing out it's biased.

Or are people here seriously suggesting Amnesty International research is sloppy it's journalists are dumb etc etc. I mean really?

There's only one thing proven here, Western media can no longer be trusted when they decide to dismiss Amnesty Internationals critical report, lol.

Woke "progressive" fuckheads simply didn't like a critical report so fuck Amnesty International. What a disgrace, lol




We're talking about Amnesty International and you felt that their report isn't credible because their Ukrainian branch wasn't involved which only makes sense...

Check your previous posts

This post was edited by Djunior on Sep 12 2022 02:35pm

You just said that the Ukrainian branch of Amnesty International isn't credible.

Right after telling me for pages and pages that I should trust AI without second thought.

You walked right into this one. There's really no salvaging it.

I say Amnesty decided to NOT involve their Ukrainian branch. On purpose. To prevent the other side (Russia) could simply dismiss the report by pointing out Ukrainian branch is biased.

What are you going to try next, pointing out I made a typo somewhere?

I said they didn't target civilian infrastructure.

You link me to a story about the shelling of ZNPP.

I point out Ukraine shelled that, as they themselves admitted and boasted about.

You said OK, but there were Russians there.

See the problem, here? Do you think this sort of schizophrenic way of arguing is convincing, or is it just how your brain works?

So let me get this straight.

Your position is that Amnesty International made an anti-Ukraine article bashing them for using civilian areas as shelter and firing grounds and didn't include their Ukrainian branch so Russia wouldn't think it's biased against Russia.

I hope you appreciate that this makes zero sense, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and let you clarify.

The report isn't bashing Ukraine and isn't anti Ukraine, it points out Ukraine's military is actively using civilian infrastructure.

You should settle down and read the report first. Probably a couple times.

And accept that it is what it is. Ukraine aint the angels you perceive.

The country is corrupt, full of nationalists and extremists which is all well documented before the war but all of that magically disappeared under the rug as well. What coincidence

This post was edited by Djunior on Sep 12 2022 02:57pm