I don't understand why posters like you bother with PaRD.

we should be friends I keep asking myself the same question for your last 3 posts

Burden of proof is on the person making the claim. It is not anyone else's job to provide evidence of what you are saying.

I posted two scenarios

if only you could read

sigh

So the first two are the same story from original post. The fourth one is from communist Russia. The third one we can discuss but instead of discussing how rules and regulations in sports should be changed you decide to come on here flaming and being a tool.

this

this topic is hitting a little close to thim

My question to you is how many is enough?

How many is enough before you personally feel that the police/government/whoever are crossing the line?

Does it have to be a man? Does it have to be 100 women?

what is it for you personally

Or otherwise explain your position

Its about freedom and altruism.

Thats what its about.

You need to look past the horizon, past what you see in front of you... What is the next step? WHere does it end?

You know in china the gov would force the men and women to wear the same outfits and have the exact same haircut. You know the wierd looking bowl cut some chinese mans have? Its a mark of history

Is that what you want? You think you are somehow immune to this? stop kidding yourself.

This post was edited by Crunkt on Jul 29 2022 05:05pm

Well for me personally its a case by case incident. As far as the execution one goes I agree that there should be a set standard of attire. In public I mean thats a tough one. I dont think a crop top and short skirts are indecent exposure but they were clearly responding to her because she was showing excess ( pubic hairs or something along those lines ). With sports as long as everyone is afforded the same opportunity to wear the outfits they choose then I dont see an issue with it.

By the way I think the government and police are constantly crossing the line. I just dont think your original examples go so far out of bounds as to make an assumption that they were innocent or that men are ruling over women's ability to dress themselves.