Legal prostitution in America has disease management,there is no ethical repercussions
You bring up something that happened 200 years ago before we knew anything about stds it's not a valid point at all
Condoms stop the worst diseases and the others are curable and show up quickly on test
There is plenty of regulations that keep people safe in Nevada and porn,it would be stupid not to apply those same regulations to legal prostitution

You are distracting from the fact There is consequences to keeping prostitution illegal,when there is no real consequences besides how people look as us as a consequence

...and today, we use the term to describe a physician.

You obviously don't watch alot of porn and realize what you speak of is only a fraction of pornograpy available,there is plenty of sensual normal sex,and people are required to be sober for filming or they can get in trouble.

USA suppose to be about being free,but we want to force everyone to live a certain way and to care about the countries diginity

You are once again spouting nonsense. Nevada is in the top 5 per capita of all states in both HIV and Syphilis, and the cases per capita have been on a steady incline over the past decade.

The reality is that Nevada only requires STD screening from prostitutes once a month, and does not require STD testing from their clients. And those prostitutes who test positive for a "career-ending" STD such as syphilis and HIV specifically simply leave the brothel and move to the street and continue to spread their disease, and have up to 30 days to spread their disease freely prior to their monthly screening in the brothel.

First you respond to me with nonsensical talking points, then you claim there are no ethical ramifications. Pure gibberish. As you can see from my first response in this thread, I'm not even against legalized prostitution. My question, AGAIN, is what are the ethical ramifications of legalized prostitution without disease management?

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Jul 1 2022 10:01am

Why do we even need to REQUIRE STD testing from regulatory agencies? I imagine that higher quality prostitutes will submit to daily testing but we shouldn't regulate the market to the point that a black market will exist. People know the risks of fucking a stranger and if they get a STD, that's on them. If they LIE about that, then you can sue them for fraud.

STATES RIGHTS (when it favors us, illegal when it doesn't)

This post was edited by Cascadian on Jul 1 2022 10:09am

Why do we need to regulate drugs or medications? I imagine that higher end pharma companies and dealers will submit to quality guidelines, but we shouldn't regulate the market to the point where a black market will exist. People know the risks of using drugs and medications, so if they overdose or poison themselves, that's on them. If the companies or dealers LIE about their product, simply sue them for fraud.

You should start a campaign to fire all food inspectors... the free market will correct after people get sick

Is it a predominate usage? Yes. It's not exclusive, though. And IMO, anyone who has completed the work necessary to achieve a Ph.D has every right to be called "doctor". Physician, no. Doctor, sure.