Quote (Goomshill @ 21 Dec 2021 09:18)
He's in office (or under it) until 2025, so why stick the BBB so hard in the year its guaranteed to fail? He had an easily embraced policy victory with the bipartisan infrastructure bill. Call it boring, but at least he'd have a notch on his belt if they took a victory lap on that and wrote off the social bill, it wouldn't look like he's legislatively fucked. Yes, he's still got the same supposed opportunity for a party-line reconciliation next year, but that's the same opportunity they had this year and with the same congress. I don't see why it would turn out any different. Now his accomplishments are being overshadowed by his failures, because he staked his name onto the latter.
There are people trying to credit this to some kind of weird intentional strategy where Biden is taking the lumps for the team or whatever. Like how I speculated Trump was really just a sideshow candidate to draw fire away from Marco Rubio. About as accurate, I think. Democrats are going into the midterms looking like they cannot govern, and Republicans are going to give them a shellacking on that. As if they aren't already weak enough on enough fronts. Digging Biden deeper is going to hurt everyone downticket even when he's not on the ticket.
I think both your questions are answered by intra-party calculus and ambitions for personal legacy. Biden kept pushing the social spending bill because he knew that the progressive caucus would revolt and derail the rest of his presidency if he didn't at least
try to pass the bill which contains their priorities. I also believe that he genuinely thinks he has a mandate to enact big sweeping change and wants to go down in history as not just a transitional president but as a figure who changed the trajectory of the country. Attaching his personal slogan to the bill imho was intended to put pressure on senators like Manchin and Sinema. Biden and his team probably thought that in the end, after lots of bargaining and showboating, grandstanding and bluster, no senator would have the guts to kill THE signature bill of his own party's president.
I agree with thundercock by the way: this is not the end for any kind of legislation, it's just the end for the approach of ramming through a humongous, all-encompassing bill which is several-thousand-pages long and costing trillions of dollars. Like others have pointed out, BBB actually contained quite a few provisions which were very popular. I believe that Dems will try to repackage these (and only these) provisions in a new, more modest bill next year and try to get that passed before the midterms. Which might be better politics than ramming through BBB anyway.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Dec 21 2021 06:38am