I presented facts and you couldn't accept that New York specifically has a statutory rape law.

Why would I continue? You're not even willing to google the charges

You've presented no facts.

1. What are the exact charges?
2. What are the facts of the case?

These were the questions. You've answered neither. As I said, you're lying in favor of your narrative.

Both of those are things you can find yourself. The fact that you aren't even willing to read a single article on the subject shows you aren't here to actually learn about and discuss the case, but to muddy the water.

I've made no affirmative claims in this topic. You've made affirmatively racist claims in this topic without providing any proof, whatsoever.

It's not my job to disprove your claims. It's your job to prove them. Provide the requested information, and in so doing, help inform the readers of PaRD, or prove you have no credibility.

Simple stuff, really. Even a mouse torturer should understand something so simple. Though let's be honest... You don't actually torture the mice. You only manage the people who torture the mice. People with real degrees do the torturing, no?

The only affirmative claim I've made in this thread is that you're dishonest.

and I've been proven right. Good on me!


I torture the mice. I graft the tumors into them, inject them, and gavage them, and euthanize them when we're done or when they get too sick to continue. We are testing chemotherapy drugs after all. They're pretty rough. But I also manage people who torture mice for other projects. So I do both! Yay me!

Something that haunts your nightmares I'm sure

That question is an affirmative claim. You've claimed that something is wrong with "white culture" by asking what is wrong with it.

Tell me, white land whale, what IS wrong with white culture, that so many white land whales become landwhales in the first place, then choose to insult the culture that created an environment where things are so plentiful that their lifestyle is possible?

I genuinely tried. First 7 pages of google results didn't show me anything that seemed helpful.

I have a mild level of interest in the facts. Enough to dig around for 5 minutes. Not enough to read 400 copies of the same article hoping that one of them will talk about something other than the sentencing.

Without the facts, I can't develop an opinion. That fact that no one in this thread seems to have access to the facts makes me skeptical of any of the opinions shared here.

A question is not a claim.

Try again, and this time try to use the skills you didn't develop from that English class you apparently failed.

Took me like two seconds

https://www.niagara-gazette.com/news/local_news/no-jail-time-in-lewiston-sexual-abuse-and-rape-case/article_05ab28da-fb25-5e6d-81fa-32becfad4146.html




Third-degree rape

https://www.newyorkcriminallawyer24-7.com/third-degree-rape-new-york-penal-code-130-25.html




Defendent is only 20, so it can't be the middle option, and probably isn't the first option since he was 17 at the time and it was during "raving teenage house parties". Pretty easy to conclude here that he did some sexual assault against girls at his house parties.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Nov 24 2021 12:05am