He literally said this morning that anybody slightly right on the political spectrum is incapable of thinking scientifically. Which is uptight asshole for I am smarter and better than anybody who doesn’t vote democrat.

QUOTE=inkanddagger,Nov 6 2021 06:28pm]Name a conservative who hasn’t raped children. You literally can’t do it.[/QUOTE]

Another d2jsp user with zero credibility

This post was edited by WickedDarkJuggalos on Nov 6 2021 04:30pm

I didn't say that though.

"Here's the thing. You won't find basically anybody conservative in science. The reason is pretty simple. To go further than slightly right of center you need to fall for really obvious propaganda"

I specifically said you will find people who are slightly to the right.


It's funny that you have to tell blatant lies about me though. It makes me feel good to have destroyed you so thoroughly.

I’m sure you feel real good about your terrible arguments on d2jsp. My life is in shambles now because of the Netflix guy on the internet

I think your life is in shambles because the lockdown has slowed your child rape game. There’s literally no other reason to oppose the lockdown.

What's it like to get rekt so hard every single day? I can't think of a single conversation we've had where you didn't get decimated by a simple google search.

But I don't think being in science is the only measure of intelligence (which is what you seem to imply). I am not saying it doesn't take intelligence to excel in science, I am just saying that there are many different kinds of intelligence and maybe the conservatives are good in other areas.

I never said or implied that being in science shows a greater degree of intelligence.

What I said was it gives you the research skills to not fall for obvious propaganda. When somebody says "CRT is being taught in schools and is evil" you have the research skills to search for what CRT is, where it's taught, and why. So you can quickly figure out that it's not being taught in schools, and is actually pretty strictly limited to graduate schools and law schools and such professional organizaitions, and doesn't say the evil things that Republicans are claiming it does.

If I had to guess, Project Veritas paid someone with laundered money to break into the woman's home and steal valuable information. In addition, I bet there was some blackmail involved that exceeded a million dollars. It would not surprise me if the person investigated was in possession of child pornography.

Did you really need to include that last part? It's pretty insulting.

Like 80% of conservatives own child pornography, so I really don't think you even needed to bring it up.

This is trolling, right?

The way I see it, I literally cannot imagine what PV possibly did that was illegal or wrong. They somehow got their hands on the woman's diary, but decided not to publish it, and somehow this set off the feds, who descended on them like a pack of hyenas.