Quote (thesnipa @ 16 Aug 2021 10:56)
stealthily retreat thousands of troops via massive airbus planes? not notify the Afghan prop govt we're leaving? because if they know the Taliban knows.
leave 3 months ago, they violate, then what? we stay? fight more?
we failed to beat the taliban for 20 years, the idea we could beat them in a retreat is preposterous. they'd either realize we're retreating and move in, or a week from now they'd realize and move in.
they know we're done fighting, so they win. how we leave makes zero difference in who owns Afghanistan now. Their victory cost us trillions, and them millions of lives. but they still win.
obviously we let the Afghan govt know about our departure. same with the Taliban. we’ve been reducing troops for years now it’s no hidden secret
by stealthily i mean get our people out first. ensure weaponry and equipment and sensitive material is secured. then you negotiate an imminent withdrawal date
no we leave and stay out. we already mucked it up enough no need to do more damage like delaying the inevitable for symbolism. as you said we spent trillions “nation-building” only for the forces we trained and armed to immediately throw up their hands. its an unwinnable situation so best to leave (again, i commend finally exiting, and think relying on the taliban to honor deals is folly)
it’s all about optics for the current administration, okay fine. usually is for all administrations. but they probably should have considered how this might look, what with the nearly the entire executive branch leadership on vacation right now.
This post was edited by excellence on Aug 16 2021 09:10am