d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Conservative Cancel Culture 2 - Electric Boogaloo
Prev15678913Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 54,171
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jun 11 2021 10:28pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 11 Jun 2021 20:19)
The pro-Israel lobby is not a faction of its own. It's securely a right wing movement and has the bulk of its support in the Republican party. The leftists who criticize Israel do not generally want Israel to be dissolved by violence or otherwise, unless we're talking about the fringe loonies.

... and similarly, the rightists who defend Israel do not want the Palestinians to be abused or killed for the sake of it. :rolleyes:

Do you think that normal Republicans outside of the fringe loonies would support Israel bombing Gaza if there hadn't been thousands of rockets fired at Israeli cities beforehand?

Quote
And even then the most left people I follow, who are straight up anarchists (far left libertarian) fundamentally acknowledge Israel's right to exist.
I think you're buying into pro-Israel propaganda without realizing it.

In my experience, a lot of leftists ostensibly support Israel's right to exist, but at the same time also support positions which would, in practice, bring about the end of Israel. Prime example: insisting on a right to return for all Palestinians, even though such a right would render Israeli Jews a minority in their own country due to the crazy reproduction rate of the Palestinians.


----------------

Quote (thesnipa @ 11 Jun 2021 16:23)
categorizing leftist criticism of Israel as being anti israel in total and upplaying the mountains to sea narratives as if they're anything but fringe loonies is what gives me that impression.

Like I wrote to pard's latest breakout movie star yesterday, my criticism is not that the bulk of leftists are unreasonably anti-isreal or trying to cancel it - my gripe is with the way they align themselves with such groups. It's hard to portray yourself as "just asking tough question about Israel's behavior" without distancing yourself from straight up anti-semites and terrorism-apologists.

Quote
by my estimation those in the right wing that categorically dismiss any and all Israeli criticism are far more prevalent than those who categorically wish to see Israel defeated and undone in the left wing, by several orders of magnitude. largely due to religious justifications creating an intersectional political alliance between Christians and the Israeli's, also a holdover from the blank check era post Holocaust that people dont seem to be able to let go of, lastly the fact that labelling theory as "racist" is largely ineffectual on many right wing voters and draws eye rolls but "antiemetic" still holds a lot of power in both political spheres. Look just at how large of a portion of right winged voters cheered at the move of the Embassy back to Jerusalem as if it wasn't just a symbolic gesture that had little if any realistic purpose.

Fair enough, and I disagree with this kind of reflexive pro-Israel stance. Evangelicals in particular have talked themselves into a narrative where the Israelis act as an avatar for their own struggles, and it blinds their eyes.

Quote
the right wing uses far too loose of a definition on average by comparison.

Maybe.
Quote
Similarly they view defense of Palestinian human rights themselves as antisemitism and pro terrorism.

Big disagree. Unlike the political left, conservatives tend to condition an acknowledgement of Palestinian interests and rights on an end to knife attacks on Israeli security and an end to rocket attacks on Israeli cities.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jun 11 2021 10:31pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 11 2021 10:34pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jun 11 2021 11:28pm)
... and similarly, the rightists who defend Israel do not want the Palestinians to be abused or killed for the sake of it. :rolleyes:

Do you think that normal Republicans outside of the fringe loonies would support Israel bombing Gaza if there hadn't been thousands of rockets fired at Israeli cities beforehand?


In my experience, a lot of leftists ostensibly support Israel's right to exist, but at the same time also support positions which would, in practice, bring about the end of Israel. Prime example: insisting on a right to return for all Palestinians, even though such a right would render Israeli Jews a minority in their own country due to the crazy reproduction rate of the Palestinians.


I couldn't care less if they want Palestinians abused for the sake of it. That's not the topic. Similarly, the positions of leftists holding positions that would "be the functional end of Israel" is also not the point of the discussion.

The point of the thread is they actively try to cancel people who support BDS by threatening their jobs via federal contracts. This is a massive and obvious overreach.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Jun 11 2021 10:34pm
Member
Posts: 54,171
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jun 11 2021 11:18pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 12 Jun 2021 06:34)
The point of the thread is they actively try to cancel people who support BDS by threatening their jobs via federal contracts. This is a massive and obvious overreach.

See, and that's where I have to disagree. How and where the government is spending its money is a political decision, and it is a perfectly valid political decision to say that taxpayer money should not go to those who support such a movement which has extremely strong anti-semitic overtones and which undermines one of the country's oldest and most crucial geostrategic allies.

If, for example, the government or the social media companies tried to shut down all BDS sites and channels, then that would be a completely different story and I would speak out forcefully against that. The BDS movement has a right to voice their opinion - but they are not entitled to benefit from taxpayer money.

For the record: I, personally, think that withholding all federal contracts from individual people (as opposed to politcal advocacy groups...) over their support for BDS is a step too far - but it is legitimate to do so.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jun 11 2021 11:19pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 12 2021 12:01am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jun 12 2021 12:18am)
See, and that's where I have to disagree. How and where the government is spending its money is a political decision, and it is a perfectly valid political decision to say that taxpayer money should not go to those who support such a movement which has extremely strong anti-semitic overtones and which undermines one of the country's oldest and most crucial geostrategic allies.

If, for example, the government or the social media companies tried to shut down all BDS sites and channels, then that would be a completely different story and I would speak out forcefully against that. The BDS movement has a right to voice their opinion - but they are not entitled to benefit from taxpayer money.

For the record: I, personally, think that withholding all federal contracts from individual people (as opposed to politcal advocacy groups...) over their support for BDS is a step too far - but it is legitimate to do so.


That's a pretty garbage opinion. This isn't federal money going to hostile powers. Its individuals being explicitly punished for not sending money to Israeli connected businesses. It is a blatant violation of the first amendment both in spirit and practice.

If they are found to be funneling money to Hamas, sure. That's a step too far. But punishing them for their political speech via spending their money elsewhere is so fundamental of an overstep it can only serve to highlight the rights blatant hypocrisy on the issue of free speech.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Jun 12 2021 12:04am
Member
Posts: 54,171
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jun 12 2021 12:08am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 12 Jun 2021 08:01)
That's a pretty garbage opinion. This isn't federal money going to hostile powers. Its individuals being explicitly punished for not sending money to Israeli connected businesses. It is a blatant violation of the first amendment both in spirit and practice.

If they are found to be funneling money to Hamas, sure. That's a step too far. But punishing them for their political speech via spending their money elsewhere is so fundamental of an overstep it can only serve to highlight the rights blatant hypocrisy on the issue of free speech.


Is that actually what's (supposed to be) going on? As far as I understood it, only persons or groups who explicitly endorse BDS or who refuse to do business with Israel without having any legitimate business reasons will be affected.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 12 2021 12:16am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jun 12 2021 01:08am)
Is that actually what's (supposed to be) going on? As far as I understood it, only persons or groups who explicitly endorse BDS or who refuse to do business with Israel without having any legitimate business reasons will be affected.


When you fire or withhold contacts from somebody because of their stance on BDS that is a punishment. Open and shut. It's not even remotely a question in American law.
Member
Posts: 54,171
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jun 12 2021 12:41am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 12 Jun 2021 08:16)
When you fire or withhold contacts from somebody because of their stance on BDS that is a punishment. Open and shut. It's not even remotely a question in American law.


When it comes to doing business with Israel: why should the American government not have the right to punish those who undermine, or support groups who undermine, its values and geostrategic goals? By the same argument, American sanctions on Iran or North Korea would also be a violation of the freedom of speech and association. Yes, I know that it's not a perfect comparison and there are subtle difference between positve and negative freedoms, but those are nonetheless examples of the government restricting economic freedoms on ideological and/or geostrategic grounds.

Things ofc get more dicey when support for BDS in one's private life leads to economic punishment.
Member
Posts: 723
Joined: Sep 3 2014
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 40%
Jun 12 2021 12:49am
Things were better when the blacks knew their place and were slaves. Now they wanna have brains and be "woke" but they'll never succeed. White man always wins.
Member
Posts: 15,995
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Jun 12 2021 04:42am
Quote (Skinned @ Jun 10 2021 09:46pm)
White fragility take right there.

I would like to cancel the desecrated flags with the blue lines.




Yeah they're straight up losers. Freak show too. Look at em.


You with your tik tok buddies in a room = freak show ;)

Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 12 2021 08:39am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jun 12 2021 01:41am)
When it comes to doing business with Israel: why should the American government not have the right to punish those who undermine, or support groups who undermine, its values and geostrategic goals? By the same argument, American sanctions on Iran or North Korea would also be a violation of the freedom of speech and association. Yes, I know that it's not a perfect comparison and there are subtle difference between positve and negative freedoms, but those are nonetheless examples of the government restricting economic freedoms on ideological and/or geostrategic grounds.

Things ofc get more dicey when support for BDS in one's private life leads to economic punishment.


You are comparing supporting an enemy with not supporting an ally you disagree with politically. Not remotely the same.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Jun 12 2021 08:40am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15678913Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll