Quote (Black XistenZ @ Feb 3 2021 02:16am)
It's really remarkable when two of the usually smarter posters on PaRD get bamboozled in an argument by Bobb, and with ease. Like... seriously, thor, handcuffs, what the fuck is wrong with you? Screw the rule of law, screw free speech, let's just apply violence and even terrorism against "thoughtcrime" - that's your position on the issue? :wallbash:
Violence, bombings or terrorism are only ethically justifiable means of self-defense if several criteria are met:
1.: the "hate group" is in enough of a position of power that it poses a significant threat to the well-being of others.
2.: law enforcement or anti-terror agencies have been given a chance to deal with the threat, and failed.
3.: peaceful forms of protest and ostracism have been tried and failed.
4.: due diligence was applied to make sure that only the true extremists are targetted by your preemptive action.
Now, nobody was hurt in the case right here, and these hateful religious fuckers deserved a punch in the face anway, so I dont want to blow this incident out of proportion. However, the mindset you two have shown in your defense of a literal fucking bomb attack against a civilian target is quite frankly shocking.
