Quote (Thor123422 @ Jan 29 2021 04:09pm)
This kind of argument is not convincing to me. If you want me to stop from doing something with my body you need a compelling reason. "It's the consequences" is not a compelling reason to stop the consequences from happening. If I put bacon on my face nobody then argues I can't get a face treatment for the acne. What is the reason I can't work to avert consequences from previous action in this case?
a human fetus is not acne....
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jan 29 2021 04:58pm)
None of what I've said requires ownership over the fetus, or the fetus to be part of the mother.
If I want to expel something from my body, I have the right to do that absent a compelling reason to prevent me from doing it.
You might say the compelling reason is that I would kill the fetus, and the fetus is a person, but that only holds water with me after 23 weeks, and is dependent on the fetus having a right to your body that supersedes your own right to bodily autonomy afterwar 23 weeks.
you choose to give up that right when you choose to have sex.