Quote (IceMage @ Dec 20 2020 02:41pm)
Trump is the leader of America, particularly the executive branch, so when Russia has a very successful hack into key government entities, I think most people expect some sort of acknowledgement. Perhaps some level of concern shown. I understand anytime Trump is absent as a leader, you like to play the "stop obsessing over his absence", but most of us here care about what our leaders do.
What's weird is how Trump acts in response to this sort of stuff, not my reaction to it. In fact, his blatant incompetence is typically a barrier to fruitful conversation.
I think it's better when Trump isn't involved. He's done a fairly decent job outsourcing judges to the Federalist Society and he made Pence in charge of Operation Warp Speed. If he shuts up and lets the agencies do their thing, I think that's the best course of action.
Quote (Bazi @ Dec 20 2020 12:05pm)
I mean I am kind of confused
I think it is a reasonable assumption that the US also participates in these types of affairs.
No damage was done and it was just observation, correct?
If so, I don’t see how any retaliation is warranted here
We don't know if damage was done but I'd argue that obtaining knowledge IS damaging. If Coca-Cola's recipe became public, that would be damaging to them because it's a trade secret.