d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Antifa Starting Wildfires
Prev15678Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 16 2020 12:31am
Quote (proccy @ Sep 16 2020 12:57am)
Delusional drunk ramblings of a low iq d2jspeon


Ink is like the 3rd best poster on the forum
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Sep 16 2020 12:35am
Quote (Plaguefear @ Sep 15 2020 11:27pm)
Ahaha fred girod walked out of the senate to avoid a quorum on climate change and now his house has burned down.


He doesn't fucking care. He absolutely blames "Antifa and environmentalists!" for it. He will never change his opinion.
Member
Posts: 38,671
Joined: Apr 1 2007
Gold: 8.21
Sep 16 2020 09:01am
Quote (inkanddagger @ Sep 15 2020 11:35pm)
He doesn't fucking care. He absolutely blames "Antifa and environmentalists!" for it. He will never change his opinion.


I literally posted numerous times how skeptical I am of these rumors ya twit :p
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Sep 16 2020 11:29am
Quote (Plaguefear @ Sep 16 2020 02:27am)
Ahaha fred girod walked out of the senate to avoid a quorum on climate change and now his house has burned down.


And?
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Sep 16 2020 11:45am
So it seems the fires are caused by armed locals with a red cap
Member
Posts: 49,896
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Sep 16 2020 03:50pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Sep 17 2020 03:29am)
And?


Not going to debate a science denier.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 16 2020 04:50pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ Sep 16 2020 02:35am)
He doesn't fucking care. He absolutely blames "Antifa and environmentalists!" for it. He will never change his opinion.


There's some truth to environmentalists being to blame for this. Retarded environmental standards essentially stopped controlled burning in western coastal states. Burnings that experts agree would have prevented runaway massive fires.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 16 2020 05:12pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 16 2020 05:50pm)
There's some truth to environmentalists being to blame for this. Retarded environmental standards essentially stopped controlled burning in western coastal states. Burnings that experts agree would have prevented runaway massive fires.


Can you show me where "environmentalists" are to blame for that? I remember in last year's fires it was brought up that they started on federal land after the budget for maintenance was cut. I'd be interested if there's actually a trail of events that can be traced back to "environmentalists"

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Sep 16 2020 05:12pm
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Sep 16 2020 05:20pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 16 2020 07:12pm)
Can you show me where "environmentalists" are to blame for that? I remember in last year's fires it was brought up that they started on federal land after the budget for maintenance was cut. I'd be interested if there's actually a trail of events that can be traced back to "environmentalists"


Quote
there are the regulation-related barriers. Air board approval is one bottleneck. The experts interviewed felt that the working definition of “acceptable weather conditions” has been strict, which can cut short multi-day burn plans. There are also many local air boards around the state, and a lack of consistency can create problems for burn projects that have to involve more than one of them.

There’s some friction, in that the particulate pollution and carbon dioxide emissions of prescribed burns are counted as human-caused, while emissions from wildfires go in a separate category. There’s no offset for prescribed burns reducing potential wildfire emissions.

It’s also true that burns supported by state or federal grants have to undergo additional environmental reviews, which can sometimes hold up projects past windows of opportunity. The researchers say that the experts they talked to felt these reviews are designed for larger projects and don’t work well with prescribed burns. They were also leery of weakening environmental protections, though, so there was no clear recommendation.


https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/01/why-isnt-california-using-more-prescribed-burns-to-reduce-fire-risk/
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Sep 16 2020 06:20pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 16 2020 04:20pm)



So they don’t want a massive out of control fire so they restrict it to certain conditions, and they also don’t want people dropping dead from smoke which gets trapped in the fishbowl of the LA river valley like they are now?

Fucking environmentalists.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15678Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll