Quote (Saucisson6000 @ May 1 2020 07:56am)

"To own a gun, in Canada, you must be 18 years of age and obtain a firearms licence, which requires going through a screening process, a background check, completing a public safety course and observing a mandatory waiting period."

canada = 31 guns / 100 people

from "Why Canada’s gun death rate is seven times lower than the United States"

https://www.cantechletter.com/2017/10/why-canadas-gun-death-rate-is-seven-times-lower-than-the-united-states/


My opinion is Canadian gov is trying to reduce spectacular events happening with this kind of weapons ("domestic" two handed semi auto, right?), simply.
I'm also curious if the sales for this kind of weapons are increasing vs regular one handed.

Quote (cambovenzi @ Apr 30 2020 08:40pm)

I'll give you some credit here and say you are lying.
We know that you are deranged and detached from reality(Textbook late stage TDS) and don't have the mental capacity, composure or integrity required to understand and admit that you are wrong, but i still think you have enough working brain cells to know that you are making intentionally false statements. Lying.


Disagreeing with you and questioning and belittling ridiculous claims from a far-left disreputable smear organisation(SPLC) that you blindly parrot is not the same as being an apologist for actual white nationalism or 'regularly making excuses'.

The meme perfectly illustrated the situation. You are an emotional child that falsely calls people names like white nationalist instead of making and addressing valid points. Grow up. Strive to not be a garbage person.

Quote (duffman316 @ May 7 2020 01:48pm)

He has a point cam, i do believe your contribution to the recent thread about two white guys chasing down a black guy with guns was a stephan molyneux meme was it not?

Add to that the fact that no one has been able to find a direct criticism of trump by you on this forum (do please link me if im wrong) during the last 3 years particularly when he's going for some very anti libertarian policies and you can see why some might have the perception that you never criticize anything right wing and your existence on this sf consists of attacks on the left.

Quote (duffman316 @ May 7 2020 01:48pm)

He has a point cam, i do believe your contribution to the recent thread about two white guys chasing down a black guy with guns was a stephan molyneux meme was it not?

Add to that the fact that no one has been able to find a direct criticism of trump by you on this forum (do please link me if im wrong) during the last 3 years particularly when he's going for some very anti libertarian policies and you can see why some might have the perception that you never criticize anything right wing and your existence on this sf consists of attacks on the left.

Quote (duffman316 @ May 7 2020 12:48pm)

He has a point cam, i do believe your contribution to the recent thread about two white guys chasing down a black guy with guns was a stephan molyneux meme was it not?

Add to that the fact that no one has been able to find a direct criticism of trump by you on this forum (do please link me if im wrong) during the last 3 years particularly when he's going for some very anti libertarian policies and you can see why some might have the perception that you never criticize anything right wing and your existence on this sf consists of attacks on the left.

Quote (Duckling @ May 7 2020 03:03pm)

The left is objectively evil though

Quote (Thor123422 @ May 7 2020 03:06pm)

Best I got out of him was an exchange like

"Waiting on libertarians to say Trump hates freedom and the bump stock ban is unconsitutional"
Cam: "Trump hates freedom and the bump stock ban is unconstitutional"

And that's all I've gotten out of him in 3 years.

Quote (thesnipa @ 7 May 2020 19:32)

maple syrup.

Quote (Saucisson6000 @ May 7 2020 02:55pm)

Maybe Canada is trying to not becoming like US regarding shootings.
Cambo is better than you.

Quote (Goomshill @ May 1 2020 11:21am)

The biggest mass murder in US history was committed with a few box cutters to kill 2996. We just passed the 15th anniversary of an attack that killed 169 people with a homemade bomb. The worst mass shooting in US history, done by a guy with an uninterrupted barrage on a crowd with rapid fire for ten minutes and 1000+ rounds, killed 58. The Las Vegas shooting was unprecedented for just how long he had to rain fire on a crowd that couldn't flee and had nothing to hide behind, and with an attacker so well prepared and heavily armed that he had actually done ballistic math and checked the wind to calculate optimal fire. And he killed less people than a jihadi in france who rented a truck and drove it in a straight line. The vast majority of attempted mass shootings, even by well prepared attackers, tend to kill in the 5-10 range, only a small number of 20+ in all us history. The Iroquois Theatre fire for contrast killed 602, the Cocoanut Grove fire killed 492, and a few wildfires killed 1000+ as they took out cities.

Actual mass shootings with large numbers of fatalities are so infrequent and insignificant compared to every other form of disaster and mass death, and not even a blip compared to the vastly higher number of deaths to mundane handgun crime. Only morons like someone descended from Geobbels gets hung up thinking scary looking long rifles are 'tools of constant mass killings' when statistically they amount to less deaths than handguns, less deaths than knives, less deaths than blunt objects and less deaths than unarmed murders with hands and fists. If we cared about what statistically is the highest death toll, we'd get handguns out of black neighborhoods. If we cared about what potential weaknesses we have against determined and intelligent attackers plotting mass murders, than a long gun isn't even close to the deadliest thing a terrorist could do. Hell, you could kill more people right now with nothing but your sneezes.

Quote (dro94 @ May 7 2020 03:23pm)

5 dead 10,000 times or 500 dead 100 times is irrelevant. Shit argument.