d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > 4 Dead, 15 Wounded At Garlic Festival Shooting
Prev15678910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Jul 29 2019 03:50pm
So what was the motive
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jul 29 2019 03:51pm
So the shooter is a young one who recommended a far right / fascist book before doing the non sense murders which includes 2 children

I guess that now 2/3 of PARD will quietly avoid this topic
Member
Posts: 1,701
Joined: Mar 16 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jul 29 2019 03:53pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Jul 29 2019 02:51pm)
So the shooter is a young one who recommended a far right / fascist book before doing the non sense murders which includes 2 children

I guess that now 2/3 of PARD will quietly avoid this topic


lol yeah get ready for the spins or they'll go straight to "Trump won, get over it"

oops or they will deflect by talking about muslims

This post was edited by GodSmiter on Jul 29 2019 03:53pm
Member
Posts: 2,660
Joined: Mar 28 2010
Gold: 0.00
Jul 29 2019 04:14pm
Quote (Skinned @ Jul 29 2019 04:50pm)
Engage me? You were trying to be a smartass and mainsplain shit you didn't have your head wrapped around.


https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/plea_bargain

Quote
Plea bargain
Overview
Many successful criminal prosecutions in the United States end not with jury trials, but with plea bargains. Plea bargains are agreements between defendants and prosecutors in which defendants agree to plead guilty to some or all of the charges against them in exchange for concessions from the prosecutors. These agreements allow prosecutors to focus their time and resources on other cases, and reduce the number of trials that judges need to oversee.

In plea bargains, prosecutors usually agree to reduce a defendant's punishment. They often accomplish this by reducing the number of charges of the severity of the charges against defendants. They might also agree to recommend that defendants receive reduced sentences. Some plea bargains require defendants to do more than simply plead guilty. For example, prosecutors often offer favorable plea bargains to defendants who agree to testify for the state in cases against other defendants.

According to the Department of Justice's Bureau of Justice Assistance, "The overwhelming majority (90 to 95 percent) of cases result in plea bargaining."

The Role of Judges
In some jurisdictions, prosecutors and defendants can work with judges to predetermine what sentence the defendants will get if the defendants accept plea bargains. In most jurisdictions, however, judges’ role in plea bargaining is limited. For example, federal judges retain final authority over sentencing decisions, and are not bound by prosecutors’ recommendations, even if the recommendations are part of plea bargains. Similarly, federal judges may not be directly involved in plea bargain negotiations.

Controversy Surrounding Plea Bargains
Although plea bargaining allows the criminal justice system to conserve resources, the plea bargains are controversial. Some commentators oppose plea bargains, as they feel that plea bargains allow defendants to shirk responsibility for the crimes they have committed. Others argue that plea bargains are too coercive and undermine important constitutional rights. Plea bargaining does require defendants to waive three rights protected by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments: the right to a jury trial, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to confront witnesses. The Supreme Court, however, in numerous cases (such as Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970) has held that plea bargaining is constitutional. The Supreme Court, however, has held that defendants’ guilty pleas must be voluntary, and that defendants may only plead guilty if they know the consequences of doing so. McCarthy v. United States 394 U.S. 459 (1969).


https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/the-basics-plea-bargain.html

Quote
A plea bargain is an agreement between a defendant and a prosecutor, in which the defendant agrees to plead guilty or "no contest" (nolo contendere) in exchange for an agreement by the prosecutor to drop one or more charges, reduce a charge to a less serious offense, or recommend to the judge a specific sentence acceptable to the defense.


https://www.justice.gov/usao/justice-101/pleabargaining

Quote
Plea Bargaining
When the Government has a strong case, the Government may offer the defendant a plea deal to avoid trial and perhaps reduce his exposure to a more lengthy sentence.

A defendant may only plead guilty if they actually committed the crime and admits to doing so in open court before the judge. When the defendant admits to the crime, they agree they are guilty and they agree that they may be “sentenced” by the judge presiding over the court — the only person authorized to impose a sentence. Sometimes the Government will agree, as part of a plea agreement, not to recommend an enhanced sentence (such as additional time in prison for certain reasons) but it is left up to the judge to determine how the defendant will be punished.

If a defendant pleads guilty, there is no trial, but the next step is to prepare for a sentencing hearing.


I didn't dive into anything I don't understand. Have fun with your twisted word view.
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jul 29 2019 04:32pm
Quote (Santara @ Jul 29 2019 02:28pm)
#BlackGunsMatter


Actually a brilliant idea
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Jul 29 2019 04:47pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Jul 29 2019 05:32pm)
Actually a brilliant idea


https://twitter.com/blkgunsmattr
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Jul 29 2019 04:49pm
Member
Posts: 92,990
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jul 29 2019 04:51pm
Quote (Ghot @ Jul 29 2019 04:13pm)
Population density matters too. They published a study in Nature, back in the late 70's early 80's. They put mice in the same pop. density as the people in NYC.
The mice started killing each other, stealing food, raping , etc.

The US has densities approaching that of Indonesia as well... but generally in large cities. I just made the population point and the point that we had to count ALL murders, not just guns, when making comparisons.

I just didn't want to see UK US comparisons with incorrect assumptions... again.


i'd argue you'd do better to isolate mass murders. you can isolate mass vehicles, bombs, guns, knives, etc. low perp number high body count. that might yield some data.

all murders is a valid stat its just not very useful, even when controlled just for population. the outcome is "humans kill in tight space" which doesn't push policy anywhere.
Member
Posts: 50,897
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Jul 29 2019 04:53pm
hey penis_hat you'd get a kick out of this one:

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/instagram-account-connected-gilroy-shooter-pushed-staple-white-supremacist-internet-n1035926

a single reference to 'might is right' on an instagram account in a shooting with no known motive is all it took for NBC to list;
  • proto-fascist white supremacist
  • white nationalist literature
  • far-right websites.
  • anti-Semitic rhetoric.
  • neo-Nazis and white supremacists
  • extremist sites such as 4chan’s /pol/ board
  • National Vanguard
  • Stormfront
  • The Daily Stormer.
  • Mein Kampf.
  • domestic terrorism
  • New Zealand, mosque shootings
  • 8chan
  • Poway synagogue shooting
  • Nazi imagery and ends with a Nazi chant.


They have built that entire association based solely on him mentioning the book Might is Right, the same one reviewed glowingly here by the 1919 The Communist, The Official Organ of the Communist Party of America;
https://www.unionofegoists.com/2019/05/16/the-communist-party-of-america-might-is-right/

back in realityland, 95% chance the shooting was motivated by mundane mental illness / depression / teenage angst, seeing as it bears the hallmarks of the average school shooting (albeit in a different setting).
Heck, he even told someone who ask why he's shooting them "I'm really angry"

My good rule of thumb is, if you have to speculate what the motive is, it isn't terrorism and it isn't political at all. Because terrorists by definition want to make their motive known, and do a good job at it, like posting manifestos
The guy who streamed the mosque shootings didn't leave any doubt whatsoever. Cesar Sayoc's van was plastered in MAGA to an obscene degree.

So what does it tell us when NBC news is running articles like this, trying to spooky associate the shooter with the far-right based solely on him making a reference to a book from 1890 that has dick all to do with the modern alt-right and most likely has nothing whatsoever to do with his shootings, which are extremely unlikely to be politically motivated? This is NBC, a major network, engaging in some of the most dementedly irresponsible agitprop journalism even thought they know the truth about the kid's motive is probably going to come out in a matter of hours or days.
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jul 29 2019 04:56pm
Looks like the shooter was Iranian and posted anti-white hate on twitter.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15678910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll