d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > So About That Republican Tax Plan
Prev15678922Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Dec 2 2017 06:50am
Quote (dro94 @ Dec 2 2017 07:49am)
I have no idea what you're referring to but I'm offended on behalf of pardians by saying they're impressionable


Considering how non-empirical Hayek was you have to be impressionable to really buy into it.
Member
Posts: 53,548
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
Dec 2 2017 06:51am
>savings is destruction. animal spirits! break more windows to stimulate the economy. krugman wrote my economics textbook btw

Quote
Considering how non-empirical Hayek was you have to have not abandoned logic and reason to buy into it.

ftfy
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Dec 2 2017 06:53am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Dec 2 2017 07:51am)
>savings is destruction. animal spirits! break more windows to stimulate the economy. krugman wrote my economics textbook btw


ftfy


As long as you're into poor philosophy, Ayn Rand might have something to offer. She thought she was logical as well. But she is misusing the word, like it is being used here.

Because Hayek wasn't using the associative or communicative properties with his theory. I bet he didn't know what DeMorgan's rule is. Most people who throw that word around doesn't know what it means and they are saying it instead of saying it's their feelings, which is more accurate. Hayek emotionally resonates with you, and that's ok.

This post was edited by Skinned on Dec 2 2017 06:56am
Member
Posts: 53,548
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
Dec 2 2017 06:57am
Quote (Skinned @ Dec 2 2017 07:53am)
As long as you're into poor philosophy, Ayn Rand might have something to offer. She thought she was logical as well.


im not too fond of ayn rand tbh, but lets not pretend she didnt write about something very logical that is commonly misunderstood or unknown to people of your religious/sexual orientation. (statism)

e/ in particular the notion that people acting in their self interest can serve to benefit others more efficiently through capitalism than your centrally planned economies and SJW feelings-based policies.
you typically resort to laughing at the 'invisible hand' as some silly superstition and hope onlookers dont know what that really means.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Dec 2 2017 07:02am
Member
Posts: 33,771
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
Dec 2 2017 07:02am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Dec 2 2017 01:51pm)
>savings is destruction. animal spirits! break more windows to stimulate the economy. krugman wrote my economics textbook btw


ftfy


We may not agree on some issues but I'm pretty sure we can all agree that Paul Krugman is one of the best economists of the last 20 years.
Member
Posts: 53,548
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
Dec 2 2017 07:04am
Quote (dro94 @ Dec 2 2017 08:02am)
We may not agree on some issues but I'm pretty sure we can all agree that Paul Krugman is one of the best economists of the last 20 years.


lel. hes turned into a quivering, quibbling hack.
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Dec 2 2017 07:04am
Why are things like this in a fucking tax bill?

https://twitter.com/TitusNation/status/936736961145876485

Quote
In the TAX PLAN they put in

An abortion law reclassifying life at conception.

A clause to drill oil in Alaska’s arctic wildlife preserve.

Pulled the mandate for the ACA. 13 million lose insurance
Member
Posts: 53,548
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
Dec 2 2017 07:06am
If you feel like leaving your krugman safe space i recommend this podcast

http://contrakrugman.com/
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Dec 2 2017 07:10am
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Dec 2 2017 07:12am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Dec 2 2017 07:57am)
im not too fond of ayn rand tbh, but lets not pretend she didnt write about something very logical that is commonly misunderstood or unknown to people of your religious/sexual orientation. (statism)

e/ in particular the notion that people acting in their self interest can serve to benefit others more efficiently through capitalism than your centrally planned economies and SJW feelings-based policies.
you typically resort to laughing at the 'invisible hand' as some silly superstition and hope onlookers dont know what that really means.


You keep misusing the word logic lol.


Quote (balrog66 @ Dec 2 2017 08:10am)


A group of Americans elected a bunch of idiots to do something they can't do and now they're not secure enough to admit they've done this. They are grossly incompetent.

This post was edited by Skinned on Dec 2 2017 07:15am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15678922Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll