d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The Free Market Case Against Charity
Prev15678914Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 9 2017 01:54am
Quote (tric-isHUGE @ Sep 9 2017 01:43am)
20 points? Oh, Please.

Just fucking say it.


This conversation is pointless since you don't even have a psych 101 level understanding of what IQ indicates, and what it doesn't.

You're doing what all racists do, cherry picking data with zero actual understanding of what it means.
Member
Posts: 17,271
Joined: Apr 26 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 9 2017 01:56am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 9 2017 07:54am)
This conversation is pointless since you don't even have a psych 101 level understanding of what IQ indicates, and what it doesn't.

You're doing what all racists do, cherry picking data with zero actual understanding of what it means.


Please, could you clarify the subject for me?
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 9 2017 02:00am
Quote (tric-isHUGE @ Sep 9 2017 01:56am)
Please, could you clarify the subject for me?


You're going to have to do your own homework. I can recommend some basic resources, but the field of intelligence testing is pretty large, so I can't really hold your hand through it.
Member
Posts: 17,271
Joined: Apr 26 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 9 2017 02:11am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 9 2017 08:00am)
You're going to have to do your own homework. I can recommend some basic resources, but the field of intelligence testing is pretty large, so I can't really hold your hand through it.


I knew it! XD

There are different theories on IQ, where different skills/subjects have different levels of IQ, such as interpersonal skills, understanding language, hand-eye coordination etc. Theres like 16 of these or w/e. But for the most part, a "National IQ" is going to follow a normal distribution. And if that distribiution is shifted to the left, you're going to end up with lower IQ population regardless! You can split hairs all you want about different theories or whatever, but the data we HAVE paints a picture that we all already know to be true.

Just don't fucking say it. Don't even think about race in any other terms than we are all equal. Don't fucking do it.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 9 2017 02:15am
Quote (tric-isHUGE @ Sep 9 2017 02:11am)
I knew it! XD

There are different theories on IQ, where different skills/subjects have different levels of IQ, such as interpersonal skills, understanding language, hand-eye coordination etc. Theres like 16 of these or w/e. But for the most part, a "National IQ" is going to follow a normal distribution. And if that distribiution is shifted to the left, you're going to end up with lower IQ population regardless! You can split hairs all you want about different theories or whatever, but the data we HAVE paints a picture that we all already know to be true.

Just don't fucking say it. Don't even think about race in any other terms than we are all equal. Don't fucking do it.


So... the fact that I can increase my IQ by a good 10 points just by practicing taking the test means nothing?

The fact is that IQ is a pretty useless comparison unless the education level, income level, and about ten other factors are all held largely constant.

Even then it's not predictive on its own because different cultures value different facets of IQ differently.


Anyway, you just did it again. You actually went out of your way to ignore everything that is inconvenient to your position.

Yours is a view of purposeful ignorance. Whether it's to boost your own ego or just laziness I can't say, but I'm glad people like you who keep yourselves ignorant eventually lose out to those who don't.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Sep 9 2017 02:21am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 9 2017 12:15am)
So... the fact that I can increase my IQ by a good 10 points just by practicing taking the test means nothing?

The fact is that IQ is a pretty useless comparison unless the education level, income level, and about ten other factors are all held largely constant.

Even then it's not predictive on its own because different cultures value different facets of IQ differently.


Anyway, you just did it again. You actually went out of your way to ignore everything that is inconvenient to your position.

Yours is a view of purposeful ignorance. Whether it's to boost your own ego or just laziness I can't say, but I'm glad people like you who keep yourselves ignorant eventually lose out to those who don't.


tric is correct though. Jews and Asians are significantly smarter than their Caucasian counterparts. Blacks are significantly more athletic than their white counterparts. Hispanics are typically considered better looking than every other race in the world. It's okay to acknowledge differences as long as you're not a dick about it.
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Sep 9 2017 02:30am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 9 2017 12:15am)
So... the fact that I can increase my IQ by a good 10 points just by practicing taking the test means nothing?

The fact is that IQ is a pretty useless comparison unless the education level, income level, and about ten other factors are all held largely constant.

Even then it's not predictive on its own because different cultures value different facets of IQ differently.


Anyway, you just did it again. You actually went out of your way to ignore everything that is inconvenient to your position.

Yours is a view of purposeful ignorance. Whether it's to boost your own ego or just laziness I can't say, but I'm glad people like you who keep yourselves ignorant eventually lose out to those who don't.


it seems as though your main gripe of IQ is the validity of the testing rather than the meat of the matter, the correlation between success and IQ, violent behavior and low IQ, etc.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 9 2017 02:30am
Quote (thundercock @ Sep 9 2017 02:21am)
tric is correct though. Jews and Asians are significantly smarter than their Caucasian counterparts. Blacks are significantly more athletic than their white counterparts. Hispanics are typically considered better looking than every other race in the world. It's okay to acknowledge differences as long as you're not a dick about it.


The issue is that what constitutes "smart" is heavily dependent on the society, and that facet of IQ isn't something you can operationalize and put on a test.

Asians are "smart" in the western sense, but if we are going to say that we are ignoring that they are "dumb" at relationships.

However some societies see how you maintain and build relationships as also being "smart".


When you talk about "smart" and "intelligent" you're using loaded terminology, and it's still a very weak predictor of success. If you're too "smart" you're far more likely to be unsuccessful.



There's a dozen reasons why citing intelligence as the reason why certain races behave differently in the same society isn't valid, which is what this conversation was started with.



Quote (majorblood @ Sep 9 2017 02:30am)
it seems as though your main gripe of IQ is the validity of the testing rather than the meat of the matter, the correlation between success and IQ, violent behavior and low IQ, etc.


That's one major gripe, the other is that "intelligence" doesn't necessarily correlate with success because success itself is highly personal and loosely defined.

There are many better predictors of violence and crime, such as educational attainment of the parents and overall income level. Surprise surprise, these also influence how well you do on IQ tests.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Sep 9 2017 02:32am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 9 2017 02:33am
Anyway I just finished my data analysis and submitted new jobs.

So I'm off to bed now.
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Sep 9 2017 02:38am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 9 2017 12:30am)
The issue is that what constitutes "smart" is heavily dependent on the society, and that facet of IQ isn't something you can operationalize and put on a test.

Asians are "smart" in the western sense, but if we are going to say that we are ignoring that they are "dumb" at relationships.

However some societies see how you maintain and build relationships as also being "smart".


When you talk about "smart" and "intelligent" you're using loaded terminology, and it's still a very weak predictor of success. If you're too "smart" you're far more likely to be unsuccessful.



There's a dozen reasons why citing intelligence as the reason why certain races behave differently in the same society isn't valid, which is what this conversation was started with.





That's one major gripe, the other is that "intelligence" doesn't necessarily correlate with success because success itself is highly personal and loosely defined.

There are many better predictors of violence and crime, such as educational attainment of the parents and overall income level. Surprise surprise, these also influence how well you do on IQ tests.


do you not think that IQ can be a relatively useful indicator of these things?

earlier you recommended resources on this, what are your favorite resources for IQ related studies?

/e also there are different types of IQ which cover the things you mention such as spacial reasoning, linguistic intelligence, and others. Asians typically score high on spacial reasoning while ashkenazi jews on the linguistic.

This post was edited by majorblood on Sep 9 2017 02:41am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15678914Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll