Quote (thundercock @ Sep 9 2017 02:21am)
tric is correct though. Jews and Asians are significantly smarter than their Caucasian counterparts. Blacks are significantly more athletic than their white counterparts. Hispanics are typically considered better looking than every other race in the world. It's okay to acknowledge differences as long as you're not a dick about it.
The issue is that what constitutes "smart" is heavily dependent on the society, and that facet of IQ isn't something you can operationalize and put on a test.
Asians are "smart" in the western sense, but if we are going to say that we are ignoring that they are "dumb" at relationships.
However some societies see how you maintain and build relationships as also being "smart".
When you talk about "smart" and "intelligent" you're using loaded terminology, and it's still a very weak predictor of success. If you're too "smart" you're far more likely to be unsuccessful.
There's a dozen reasons why citing intelligence as the reason why certain races behave differently in the same society isn't valid, which is what this conversation was started with.
Quote (majorblood @ Sep 9 2017 02:30am)
it seems as though your main gripe of IQ is the validity of the testing rather than the meat of the matter, the correlation between success and IQ, violent behavior and low IQ, etc.
That's one major gripe, the other is that "intelligence" doesn't necessarily correlate with success because success itself is highly personal and loosely defined.
There are many better predictors of violence and crime, such as educational attainment of the parents and overall income level. Surprise surprise, these also influence how well you do on IQ tests.
This post was edited by Thor123422 on Sep 9 2017 02:32am