Quote (thesnipa @ 25 Oct 2016 11:41)
while i agree with this i'd hope you aren't foolish enough to think we could make an omelet without cracking the eggs. Sure its only a small step that cost perhaps more than its worth, usually the first step is riddled with problems. And the companies retain a high profit, shocker that they wouldn't accept their industry crumbling over night. And given the challenges HRC's stance should be seen as a politically expedient one IMO, not her personal stance whatever the hell that is. In short, its shitty because it has to be shitty. A perfect system out of the gates was never possible.
Philosophically, I agree that it was a good first step in that I think everyone has a right to health care.
However, I don't think we will be able to put together a good health care plan for the people until we can figure out how to decrease the influence of the health insurance and pharmaceutical industrys' lobbying in health care policy.
I think it's incorrect to say we
had to have a shitty system out of the gates, unless you are factoring in the current state of American lobbyism and corporate interests dictating public policy, in which I'd agree with you. There are underlying issues regarding how policy is formed in Washington that we need to address first.