Quote (someone3 @ Jan 15 2011 10:18am)
Technically true. I'll rephrase it.
I shouldn't have to go out of my way/not do something a rational person would ordinarily choose to do (i.e. go to a restaurant, bar, take public transportation, ...) just so I can avoid the odor or cigarettes.
By smoking, you're infringing on my rights to only somewhat toxic air, eyes and lungs that don't burn when I'm in public ...
Also, on a side note, I'd be curious to know how many of the studies downplaying the risks associated with second hand smoke were funded either by someone who profits from the tobacco industry or who themselves is an avid smoker.
No matter how many ways you try to rephrase it, it boils down to one simple fact: People who don't WANT to deal with cigarette smoke are FORCING people who do smoke to accommodate them. No matter how many ways you try to frame this as a matter of rights, you will lose because this is the premise it boils down to. Cigarette smoking is a legal activity, and people with property rights and a freedom of association who wish to allow said legal activity are being forced to disallow it by people whose rights ARE NOT being infringed.
In the other thread about smoking, I linked to a site that summarized the relative risk (RR) of EVERY major smoking study up through 2006.