d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Creationism Vs Evolution > Creationists Defend
Prev15678922Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 3129Replies: 211Track Topic
Member
Posts: 15,743
Joined: Nov 17 2006
Gold: 33.00
#61
May 20 2010 01:54am
Quote (infinitesimal @ May 19 2010 07:04pm)
I have an PhD in trolling.


More like a masters. You're still a little too conspicuous most of the time.
Member
Posts: 12,391
Joined: Nov 19 2008
Gold: 2,004.00
#62
May 20 2010 01:55am
Member
Posts: 5,962
Joined: Dec 28 2007
Gold: 0.00
#63
May 20 2010 02:00am
Banned
Posts: 2,017
Joined: Oct 27 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 20%
#64
May 20 2010 02:30am
Quote (Handcuffs @ May 19 2010 06:24pm)
Science involves faith after the fact whereas religion involves faith before the fact.

Also, it's practical to follow the "faith" in science whereas it's not practical to follow all the faith found in religion.


Proof? Seems you are just toting an opinion. Fact is also a matter of perspective. I can choose to not believe in evolution, even though it is a "fact" and has been demonstrated in laboratories.
Member
Posts: 5,901
Joined: Dec 13 2005
Gold: 2,508.53
#65
May 20 2010 02:37am
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ May 19 2010 02:32am)
Creation and evolution are not mutually exclusive .


Pretty much...

Elaboration for OP...

All arguments from both sides are, weak Scientifically, have little or no Biblical foundation and are useless to an individual on all counts.

There are good foundational points of both and they agree and coincide with the archeological evidence. Neither side, who likes to argue their point, cares to mention them because it would seem to weaken their anger!

After 20+ years of gathering information (openly on both sides), that's sadly the best summary I have for you.

----

Yes, I stopped reading from there and will probably never continue or return to this thread. <3
Member
Posts: 28,450
Joined: Apr 2 2007
Gold: 678.00
#66
May 20 2010 08:05am
Quote (Ysolol @ 20 May 2010 09:30)
Proof? Seems you are just toting an opinion. Fact is also a matter of perspective. I can choose to not believe in evolution, even though it is a "fact" and has been demonstrated in laboratories.


No.


Repost from first page:

Quote
In philosophy, the concept fact is considered in epistemology and ontology. Questions of objectivity and truth are closely associated with questions of fact. A "fact" can be defined as something which is the case, that is, the state of affairs[13]  reported by a true proposition.[14][15]

Facts may be understood as that which makes a true sentence true. For example, the statement "Jupiter is the largest planet in the solar system" is made true by the fact Jupiter is the largest planet in the solar system. Facts may also be understood as those things to which a true sentence refers. The statement "Jupiter is the largest planet in the solar system" is about the fact Jupiter is the largest planet in the solar system.[16]


This post was edited by hATemOnkEy on May 20 2010 08:06am
Banned
Posts: 2,017
Joined: Oct 27 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 20%
#67
May 20 2010 08:10am
Quote (hATemOnkEy @ May 20 2010 10:05am)
No.


Repost from first page:


hATemOnkEy is the least intelligent person to post in PaRD. This statement is made true by the fact that hATemOnkEy is the least intelligent person to post in PaRD.

Any attempt to insult me for this post or any post I have made in the past or to defend hATemOnkEy will only prove this point, this is made true by the fact that any attempt to insult me for this post or any post I have made in the past or to defend hATemOnkEy will only prove this point.

This post was edited by Ysolol on May 20 2010 08:20am
Member
Posts: 28,450
Joined: Apr 2 2007
Gold: 678.00
#68
May 20 2010 08:49am
Quote (Ysolol @ 20 May 2010 15:10)
hATemOnkEy is the least intelligent person to post in PaRD. This statement is made true by the fact that hATemOnkEy is the least intelligent person to post in PaRD.

Any attempt to insult me for this post or any post I have made in the past or to defend hATemOnkEy will only prove this point, this is made true by the fact that any attempt to insult me for this post or any post I have made in the past or to defend hATemOnkEy will only prove this point.


Your trolling is ineffective.

You know damn well what I mean.
Banned
Posts: 2,017
Joined: Oct 27 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 20%
#69
May 20 2010 08:50am
Quote (hATemOnkEy @ May 20 2010 10:49am)
Your trolling is ineffective.

You know damn well what I mean.


My trolling is ineffective is proven false by the fact that the statement on my trolling being ineffective is false.

The redundancy of redundancy is redundant.

This post was edited by Ysolol on May 20 2010 08:50am
Member
Posts: 28,450
Joined: Apr 2 2007
Gold: 678.00
#70
May 20 2010 08:55am
Quote (Ysolol @ 20 May 2010 15:50)
My trolling is ineffective is proven false by the fact that the statement on my trolling being ineffective is false.

The redundancy of redundancy is redundant.


Well, ok. Have it your way.
Good day to you, sir.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15678922Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact