Inb4 people start thinking we're going to mobilize to "roll over canada" for absolutely no reason.

40-50k Canadian troops served in Afghanistan, 2k injured, many more with PTSD for the attack on New York.

The only time article 5 was used was for defending the U.S.A.

Your president mocks us with 51st state talk. Please forgive our lack of gratitude.

Canada has never needed America to defend it, because nobody is launching an attack on Canada.

Threats have always been inflated to justify your high military spending. Lots of money to be made from fear of the big Chinese boogeyman.

No occupying force is sailing across the ocean, with or without the U.S. navy.

The fact that our soldiers fought in Afghanistan is naked proof that we're a vassal of the US dude. Tributary soldiers is standard practice for vassal states. Same with nearly all the EU. Canada had zero reason to go into there so why did we? Tribute. We send soldiers in return we get protection. Nobodies attacking Canada because we have US protection you really cant be this dumb

This post was edited by El1te on Jan 21 2026 09:05pm

If Canadians acting like catty bitches started with Trump’s presidency that excuse might hold water. It didn’t. You guys have been like this for a few decades now.

Nobody is launching an attack on Canada because America is defending it, I don’t know what you’re having trouble understanding.

Lol occupying forces have been sailing across the ocean for hundreds of years. You’re a descendant of one of those occupying forces, Einstein. They stopped at the exact moment that America said it would not be tolerated any more. Are you seriously trying to say that’s a coincidence?

Yes i don't disagree but this was the entire point of Nato to begin with so it wasn't necessary... We can revert back to medieval times where it's everyone for themselves but will that lead to a safer world, a safer america? Not a chance because the first things middle power nations or weaker nations then pivot to is force and that would mean another nuclear arms race. All because the US needs greenland "for security" except they have abandoned all their bases on greeland but have all the freedom from danish side to put as much force there as they want.. It's complete nonsense.

Your orange dictator is ruled bye NATO boss Rutte from the Netherlands.
And put back in his cage.

In the meantime, he has embarrassed all of America with his speech to the coin lickers of the WEF

I think he did pretty well all things considered.
Greenland / Iceland, who cares. Long and boring repeating the same ol lies.
But didn't walk away to look out of a window or making up stuff on the spot ACTUALLY sticking to the prompter for a good while.

For the demented man he is - he did good. Gotta give credit where its due

Rutte is almost ALWAYS brown nosing Trump to keep the peace. A few facts remain regardless of Trump’s incompetence:

1. NATO can’t beat the US in a conflict

2. NATO can’t beat Russia in a conflict without the US

3. US relies on NATO for strategic military placements

4. NATO relies on the US to do the dirty work

They want to build AI datacenters there.

ai centers supposed to be resource hogs. but since bil gates said climate change isnt really a problem .............