Quote (ofthevoid @ Aug 29 2023 02:43pm)
I don't really understand what exactly you're suggesting. What are the plans and structures? That's not really how governments work. Most of the time they are responsive not pro-active. We have so many pressing issues today that to expect them to come together and put something together for when AI/Machines automate large swaths of current jobs is not really feasible.
I listen to podcasts, mostly finance/tech focused. The big thing right now is AI. Many of these experts talk and mention the industries that may be most impacted but pretty much all of them acknowledge they have no idea how all of this will pan out. And these are experts in the field. Like the range of outcomes is canyon wide, this could be just a 'helper' like Alexa like tool amplified or it may mean futuristic, machines do 80% of the work future. So to expect bureaucrats to somehow come up with even half accurate projections for example on what % of workers will be displaced by AI, or how much AI will increase productivity is a damn near impossible task right now. You can't create departments or allocate tons of capital to things that are this uncertain. I mean you can, but it may be a complete waste because trying to predict how tech will change the world is a laughably hard task.
Creating some committee to investigate and study it is one thing, and maybe that's not so bad, maybe i'm just mis-understanding what you actually mean by structures.
creating a bipartisan committee is exactly the kind of start i'm suggesting. but there are two topics here that are often conflated, AI vs Automation. they're related, but not the same. on the topic of AI i agree, its very hard to forecast the impact. on the topic of automation that's not hard at all, we have mountains of data to use.
the outsourcing and/or automation of manual labor factory work tore a hole in communities nationwide. this wasn't some event that took place in the 1990s under Clinton like some pundits want you to believe, nor has it stopped. it's continued and will continue. i regularly design entire factories that used to employ hundreds of people per shift that now employ 1 dozen people per shift, and they're more efficient AND productive. this will continue to happen. manual labor has a death sentence hanging over it's head measured in a few decades, it's likely the greatest bipartisan in effect disaster this country has faced since the great depression. only this time we're unlikely to have the option of wide sweeping unconstitutional fixes to pull us out.
i can tell you what we need, but it's fruitless. without a few years of bipartisan reports presented from committee to open floor congress no one will even believe it. the alarm was sounded in 2016 by Yang, and what progress have we made? have we done literally anything at all? the impending crisis will make the social security crises look like nothing, and the effects will shake the world economy. but both sides want to pretend all is fine, that people who can't work are either disabled transgender veterans or lazy fucks who need to go back to work.
ive personally been talking about this for 10 years, now im just gonna wait to watch the children of those who didn't listen become slaves to a meat grinder. we laughed when we watched Wall-E, but that will prove to be eerily accurate in the long run. not for me, or my family, we've got hundreds of acres, precious metals, and the ability to produce our own livelihood. i dont need UBI, never will, nor anyone hopefully in my family line. we're 10-15 years past the point of no return, no feasible tax on automation will ever feed the UBI pool needed in a few decades, let alone 100 years. we'll sell our own govt to the corporate monopolies just to get enough food vouchers to not starve. its far too late now, and i cant even get people to accept the idea that we need a minimal sheltered pool tax.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Aug 29 2023 02:19pm