Quote (Skinned @ Jul 30 2016 08:56am)
Heh, the GOP raises more money in Super Pacs than the Democrats, yet their nominee receives none of it. It was all spent by failures in the primary, and now the war chest is open, and their nominee is being flanked by the Right and the Left.
So you have a nominee that the GOP refuses to invest in.
A historically strong candidate in the Democrat running who people don't like but believe is ready and capable (and liking a guy who wasn't capable didn't really work out under Bush II...)
We have a historically strong Libertarian running in a race.
The GOP nominee openly espouses white supremacist ideology in a multicultural society (anti-black, anti-Muslim, anti-Mexican, anti-woman, anti-special needs even.......who is left?).
It is no wonder that GOP isn't betting their money on a losing horse in Trump. They are taking all their Super Pac money and spending it on the congressional, senate, and governors races now in play for having nominated such a bad candidate. You can take this to heart.
Wtf are you talking about, they live in the same places and do the same things. For most of Indian history, the difference hasn't been a big deal. It isn't a big deal now there. They're the biggest democracy on Earth and have 100 languages and dozens of religions. They literally work together, live next to each other, etc. Quit making up things.
Trump doesn't a lot of money to run for president because people aren't investing in him. They're spending it on other races for damage control.
When this is all over the questions will be "Was Trump an agent of the Clintons?" for his role in damaging the Republican party and increasing the reign of the Clintons.
Something tells me you're not even from America.
Which then begs the question, why do you care?
You want Hillary to make another Europe, is why.