http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/donald-trump-get-national-intelligence-915748
unpatriotic turtle hairline receding reid btfo

Hindu's have been getting bombed by Muslims for over 1000 years.

https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/759132578750173184?lang=en

can't make this shit up

The Democrats at their convention started projecting all of their shortcomings onto the GOP: unamerican, corrupt, non-factual (Hillarys speech had no statistics).

It may blow up in their face.

Karma.

Hindu ideology allows people to treat their fellow humans worse than Capitalism. Being born in the dalit is much worse than being born in our urban underclass. Of course you believe in race and essence so I'm sure you agree with the caste system, and that people are born what they are and have no freedom in deciding.

Have the Hindu always treated Muslims well there? Fuck no. And it isn't like it is a foreign religion, it is one of the biggest religions in India....it isn't an outsider one like Islam in the West. The only comparison would be the Protestants and the Catholics fighting in Northern Ireland.



Trumps character is very deficient. Not presidential material. Can't have people throw temper tantrums every time some other dignitary says something he doesn't like. Plus he refuses to represent millions of Americans.

This is why in the latest polls only around 30% of Americans believe he is ready to be president, and has the character to be president. Coincidentally, 30% is probably about the amount of people voting in the GOP primary.

When you're the party of poor judgement and emotional arguments, I guess you better stick to memes to persuade gullible people.

Plus all Super Pac money comes from around 50 donors all said and done.

https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/superpacs.php

Conservative candidates are receiving a ton more money. They are probably just not going to throw it all away on this lost election, because I mean, there is only one real candidate this time.

Lol, Jeb Bush received more money from Super Pacs than Clinton has. The Republicans have spent more in their primary than the parties will spend in the actual election.

So no, you can't make that stuff up, because he is speaking the truth.

Those 50 donors who make up the Super Pacs, whom the SCOTUS said are megacitizens who should be able to control what we see and hear about the candidates, are just not going to touch this Trump thing going on. Because they do have a vested interest in the economic well-being of the US, even if it is self-interest.

This post was edited by Skinned on Jul 30 2016 08:41am

What's in Donald Trump's tax returns?
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36382410
something is weird

The Hindus are more civilized than Muslims. Stop dodging the point, retard.

And youre missing the point that Trump has raised most of his money himself or through small donations.

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN10910T

Ipsos tested three alternate versions of the presidential preference questions on different groups in a survey and compared those results to the outcome of the established version of the tracking poll.

That test found eliminating the word “Neither” from the “Neither/Other” response increased Trump support by between 3 to 5 percentage points on any given day leading up to the Republican convention. It also increased Clinton’s support, but by a smaller margin. here

Since the convention, however, Trump’s support seems to have solidified among wary supporters. Now, the “Neither” issue appears to be affecting Clinton in the survey.

On Tuesday, for example, the established tracking poll had the candidates tied at 38 percent each. A 13-point lead for Clinton on July 14 had vanished in two weeks.

But eliminating “Neither” from the “Neither/Other” answer produced a different result. In that case, Clinton was ahead, 40 percent to 36 percent, on Tuesday.

When asked the question in the new way, 11 percent of voters opted for “Other.” By comparison, 14 percent opted for “Neither/Other” in the version of the survey that showed the race tied. The three-point gap suggests the “Neither” phenomenon was now working against Clinton.


so the polls methodology was fine when sec (c)linton was up and the neither option favored her, but once the gap was closed the poll needed tweaking strictly because it "worked against (c)linton now"

Heh, the GOP raises more money in Super Pacs than the Democrats, yet their nominee receives none of it. It was all spent by failures in the primary, and now the war chest is open, and their nominee is being flanked by the Right and the Left.

So you have a nominee that the GOP refuses to invest in.
A historically strong candidate in the Democrat running who people don't like but believe is ready and capable (and liking a guy who wasn't capable didn't really work out under Bush II...)
We have a historically strong Libertarian running in a race.
The GOP nominee openly espouses white supremacist ideology in a multicultural society (anti-black, anti-Muslim, anti-Mexican, anti-woman, anti-special needs even.......who is left?).

It is no wonder that GOP isn't betting their money on a losing horse in Trump. They are taking all their Super Pac money and spending it on the congressional, senate, and governors races now in play for having nominated such a bad candidate. You can take this to heart.



Wtf are you talking about, they live in the same places and do the same things. For most of Indian history, the difference hasn't been a big deal. It isn't a big deal now there. They're the biggest democracy on Earth and have 100 languages and dozens of religions. They literally work together, live next to each other, etc. Quit making up things.

Trump doesn't a lot of money to run for president because people aren't investing in him. They're spending it on other races for damage control.

When this is all over the questions will be "Was Trump an agent of the Clintons?" for his role in damaging the Republican party and increasing the reign of the Clintons.

This post was edited by Skinned on Jul 30 2016 10:00am