...and wondering why we allowed the left to... exist.

Orange man BaD!b!1 😡 😡 🍊

I can see the parallels. But I also see the differences, and overall, I come to the conclusion that the differences are too big for the comparison to hold up.

Actually, I think that it is you who's hell bent on seeing these two cases as comparable, who's closing his eyes to the differences.



in general ... do you really think that Clinton was set up?

Democrats candidate is going to be a woman. Sorry men, you've built the country, shed your blood but now you can fuck right off.

I don't think he was set up, but I do think that the Independent Counsel had too much investigative power. They investigated potential abuses regarding Whitewater and the Lewinsky affair got caught up in all of it. Because of all that, the Special Counsel's Office was formed (e.g. Mueller) and they had FAR less investigative power.

There is no "war on men".

I'm a man, and im not a pussy, so I have no problem with a woman candidate. I feel bad for the men who are such insecure snowflakes that they see this kind of thing as an attack.

"Against better judgment, against all indications of the people's will, and against any shred of charity, an ardent and zealous minority pressed on. They had the right. They had the power. But they were wrong, and I believe history will so judge them. It is a supreme irony that the most conservative forces in our politics today have for months wielded the most radical option made available in the Constitution against this President: impeachment and removal. Aware of its dangers, our founders designed Constitutional protections against its abuse. This process has shown that those protections are not perfect; they require reasoned judgment in their application; judgment that has been missing in this process from day one.

Let us resolve to learn the lessons of this long, sad year. Let us learn now, having come this far, the wisdom of the founders that impeachment is and must be a high barricade, not to be mounted lightly. Let us learn that because it requires the overwhelming support of the Senate to succeed, it cannot and should not proceed on a merely partisan basis. Let us learn that the desire to impeach and remove must be shared broadly, or it is illegitimate.

Let us learn that the subject matter of impeachment must be a matter of great gravity, calling into question the President's very ability to lead, and endangering the nation's liberty, freedom, security. Let us learn that the case against the President must be a strong and unambiguous one in fact and in law, for even a President deserves the benefit of our reasonable doubts."

https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/02/12/senate.statements/wellstone.html

I think he said it better

Don't get me wrong. I hope it's going to be a woman candidate, gonna be epic elections once again. Savage is probably the better word ^^

It looks like it will come down to Warren vs Biden. Biden has the lead, Warren has the momentum. Sanders is stagnating with 15% of the primary voters, and I dont see ways for him to expand his base while Warren is still in the race. Harris might have been the candidate to bridge the African American and the college-educated female constituencies within the Democratic party, but she seems to flounder. Harris imho has proven to be clumsy and conniving and unlikable all at the same time.