d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Clinton 2016 > Finally, A Thread For Winners
Prev15859606162183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Aug 1 2016 06:26pm
Quote (herbdoc @ Aug 1 2016 04:50pm)
The debates will be righes with moderator questions favoring HRC

Obvious


Every question favors her :p
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Aug 1 2016 06:30pm
Quote (herbdoc @ Aug 1 2016 01:50pm)
The debates will be righes with moderator questions favoring HRC

Obvious


What would you consider a rigged question?

Something that Donald Trump doesn't have a clue about but is important for a President to have an understanding of?

If it's a rigged question because Trump doesn't understand it then every question is a rigged question
Member
Posts: 4,320
Joined: Jun 10 2012
Gold: 12,983.50
Aug 1 2016 06:32pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Aug 1 2016 07:30pm)
What would you consider a rigged question?

Something that Donald Trump doesn't have a clue about but is important for a President to have an understanding of?

If it's a rigged question because Trump doesn't understand it then every question is a rigged question


they will not ask her about any 100000 of her scandals
they will not ask her tough questions.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Aug 1 2016 06:40pm
Quote (herbdoc @ Aug 1 2016 04:32pm)
they will not ask her about any 100000 of her scandals
they will not ask her tough questions.


She's been cleared on Benghazi and the server

It would be a waste of time to spend much time on those just as it would about trumps scandals that his supporters ignore and excuse

Trump knows very little and understands very little. That being painfully obvious won't be because of a rigged question it will be because he finally got to a point in the election where 140 characters of insults will no longer cut it...at least for one night
Member
Posts: 38,317
Joined: Jul 12 2006
Gold: 20.31
Aug 3 2016 11:57am
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Aug 1 2016 04:15pm)
Anyone else remember that time last week when this model showed Trump winning and we kept having to hear about it? Figured I may as well share:

http://i.imgur.com/tlMTNkU.png


Is that 538's "Now-cast?" If that's what it is then I think they should get rid of that immediately, they should have never even made it in the first place. I'm usually in the "the more the better" camp when it comes to election data but that thing is so useless and it's so ripe for causing people to misunderstand elections that it's better off not even existing haha.

Quote (herbdoc @ Aug 1 2016 05:02pm)
Reuters polls aren't rigged


What the fuck is this shit?

Quote (Santara @ Aug 1 2016 04:08pm)
Of course you're deflecting. The criticism to which you were responding is clearly "a vote for Hiliary is a vote for putting gun grabbers onto the Supreme Court," to which you replied with commentary about Scalia, someone the likes of whom Hiliary would never in a million years appoint to the court. I showed you a clear example of how gun grabbers vote (refusing to incorporate, which would allow local and state bans to remain in effect), and the best you've got is some manufactured/prefab argument about whatever you think the issue is about, rather than what is actually being discussed.


The great thing about Scalia saying what he said, and being absolutely right about it, is that hurr durrs like you and that guy can't just laughably equate SCOTUS judges performing in their capacity with "gun grabbing" simply because you may not like how they happen to vote. It doesn't matter if Clinton would nominate him or not because he'd be fulfilling his duties just like her eventual nominee would all the same. There's never going to be a point in time when the people will not be able to determine what limits there are on their constitutionally-protected rights. The court is doing what the court is supposed to do.

Dumb people have been saying dumb things about people like Obama and Clinton being interested in coming for all their guns and they've been wrong about it, the entire time. Though thanks for the fucking laugh on the attempted projection at the end.
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Aug 3 2016 05:16pm
Quote (Pollster @ Aug 3 2016 12:57pm)
The great thing about Scalia saying what he said, and being absolutely right about it, is that hurr durrs like you and that guy can't just laughably equate SCOTUS judges performing in their capacity with "gun grabbing" simply because you may not like how they happen to vote. It doesn't matter if Clinton would nominate him or not because he'd be fulfilling his duties just like her eventual nominee would all the same. There's never going to be a point in time when the people will not be able to determine what limits there are on their constitutionally-protected rights. The court is doing what the court is supposed to do.

Dumb people have been saying dumb things about people like Obama and Clinton being interested in coming for all their guns and they've been wrong about it, the entire time. Though thanks for the fucking laugh on the attempted projection at the end.


When in doubt, double down on the deflection. kthxbai
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Aug 3 2016 05:57pm
Quote (Pollster @ 3 Aug 2016 09:57)
Is that 538's "Now-cast?" If that's what it is then I think they should get rid of that immediately, they should have never even made it in the first place. I'm usually in the "the more the better" camp when it comes to election data but that thing is so useless and it's so ripe for causing people to misunderstand elections that it's better off not even existing haha.


Lol, probably do,I was mostly posting it because the ten minutes that it went for trump, the Trumpies couldn't shut up about it, so I figure they'd be deeply invested in every change. :P

This post was edited by AiNedeSpelCzech on Aug 3 2016 05:58pm
Member
Posts: 38,317
Joined: Jul 12 2006
Gold: 20.31
Aug 4 2016 11:39am
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Aug 3 2016 04:57pm)
Lol, probably do,I was mostly posting it because the ten minutes that it went for trump, the Trumpies couldn't shut up about it, so I figure they'd be deeply invested in every change. :P


They're always going to be on to something new, that's the precarious position they're in when they've tied themselves to a terrible candidate running a terrible campaign. Trump used to garble about polls, usually cherry-picking surveys that had him ahead even if they had huge methodological flaws or what have you, but now he and his morons are off that game now that Clinton is routing him in the polls and all we're hearing about for validation is the size of his crowds. Pretty soon it'll be yard signs and bumper stickers.

I don't think his supporters have any idea just how vulnerable he is to losing this election in an blowout. He's going to have to have a really strong 96 days just to prevent this from being a 52%-41%-6%-1% Clinton rout. He could even still win this but I don't think they have any idea how at risk he is right now of totally losing control of things.

Quote (Santara @ Aug 3 2016 04:16pm)
When in doubt, double down on the deflection. kthxbai


"Deflection" is a pretty amusing way to characterize what I did, directly addressing the absurdity by simply rearranging the same pieces that you provided, but you go ahead and call it whatever you need to in order to get by.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Aug 10 2016 08:22am
Quote
The speculation started within days of Seth Rich being gunned down in what D.C. police believe was an attempted robbery near his townhouse in the Bloomingdale neighborhood of Northwest Washington.

Some on the Internet wondered if Rich was killed because of his work as a staffer with the Democratic National Committee, even suggesting he had handed WikiLeaks the 20,000 emails that embarrassed the DNC and forced the ouster of its chairwoman. Others suggested he was helping the FBI expose wrongdoing in the presidential election, and that made him a target.

On Tuesday, WikiLeaks shoved those conspiracy theories into the mainstream when it announced on Twitter a $20,000 reward for information leading to a conviction in Rich’s killing on July 10 in the 2100 block of Flagler Place NW. It adds to a $25,000 reward offered by D.C. police, customary in all District homicides.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/wikileaks-offers-reward-in-killing-of-dnc-staffer-in-washington/2016/08/09/f84fcbf4-5e5b-11e6-8e45-477372e89d78_story.html


The Clinton body count continues to grow.
Member
Posts: 30,815
Joined: Mar 12 2008
Gold: 252.29
Aug 11 2016 08:35am
You forgot to add a poll to show everyone how well she is doing.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15859606162183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll