Quote (Thor123422 @ 4 Feb 2024 13:28)
I didn't make fun of Bob at all. I genuinely hope he's doing better with his alcoholism (he admitted to drinking a liter of vodka a day, which is incredibly dangerous), and I hope he's nicer to his wife. He's told me before about how he "keeps her in line" (his words) so I genuinely hope that situation is better. He has told multiple users here that he would "hunt them down and shoot them like dogs", which is not something people in a good situation do, so I genuinely hope he's doing better now.
Also my degree is in biochemistry and I've worked using my degree the entire time I've been out of school. Been harder recently though with Pfizer flooding the market with layoffs, but you'll never go hungry with a biochemistry degree since hospitals are always hiring lab workers.
TBH this case is just open and shut. He made material misrepresentations to get a better deal that the bank relied on to make their loans. The misrepresentations weren't small mistakes, they were intentional misrepresentations. A real estate mogul signing off on a square footage 300% the actual value when he built and lived in the space is not something you get to hand waive away. Making an appraisal based on breaking up a lot that can't be broken up when you personally signed the agreement saying you can't is also not something you can say "I forgot" on. This fraud is so over the top it isn't even a good teaching tool because it's so obvious it doesn't encourage critical thought.
Just want you to admit that the judicial system is broken and it's blatantly obvious. If anyone of us was charged with the same crime you wouldn't hear about it but's its Donald Trump and he's running for President so let's mobilize MSM and any rigged courts to slander, slander, and slander again.
These are show trials. How you can't see that statistical bias is beyond me.
I don't even like Donald Trump. I don't even vote in the presidential election. I have ZERO political affiliation but I can see how unfair it is to just pile all these lawsuits on an individual. They literally all waited to drop these on Trump when they knew it would hurt him the most.
Do you see where I'm going with this.
I'm not talking about the legitimacy of a lawsuit I'm talking about the fairness and integrity of our judicial system when you see it weaponized even against someone as hated as Trump it's still wrong.
Like I said if you committed the exact same crimes(allegedly) would it be headline news? No because your not running for POTUS.
Imagine you were "hypothetically". You can't see how unfair that is? They dig up a bunch of dirt on you and just keep throwing it at you until most citizens are so sick of hearing about it?
Look at someone like Vivek Ramaswammy he was involved in a similar field as you and as soon as he became "political" he was TORCHED for building a "biotech company" and a myriad of other things.
You can say, "Oh that's just politics" but how is that a justification to slander someone with half truths into oblivion?
I don't know enough about politics so that's why I'm asking.
This post was edited by SwamiVivekananda on Feb 4 2024 01:47pm