Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 5 2023 02:27pm)
I think society has always recognized a baseline of civil conduct and stepping outside of that to be a shitflinging gibbon gets you arrested and booked on minor disorderly conduct charges. After all, civil liberties are fundamentally a tradeoff being private and public rights, person against government and vice versa, but also person vs person. Should a heavily racist angry mob be able to park itself outside a guy's home and scream racial epithets at him and threaten to murder him and we'll just trust to society to disown and shun them? I think the hated minorities of history might not sure in the absolutism
Its up to the government to keep the peace, for the people's sake. And that can be a balancing act when it comes to political speech by zealots, and the most obvious line in the sand is when police have to make the call about a political protest turning into an unlawful assembly and give orders to disperse. If the state isn't protecting the public from the rioters, they're violating the liberties of 'everyone else'
10 years ago i'd say they'd be just fine, today they'd have their names and employers online inside of 15 mins after it goes viral. social media is largely a plague, but one thing it has done is given over power to people to hold people accountable in ways that were previously not available.
on that same topic pornography used to be a big deal, because it was so well regulated (even if everyone knew that one kid who's dad was way too neglectful with his collection). now a days why even bother to try and uphold standards of decency in media that's publicly offered? when any teenager can view more porn in 30 seconds than our generation could view in a lifetime under previous standards.
history means nothing in the internet age, expression is the last freedom we'll retain moving forward. the freedom to express yourself out of civilized society included.