Quote (Pollster @ Jan 13 2016 11:20am)
Except that it does, though. You not getting the subject matter doesn't really have any bearing on its validity. The state doesn't have the electoral history that you're alleging. It wasn't even remotely competitive in the 1970s or 1980s and it hasn't been competitive since 2004. That rapid shift from a solid Republican state to a solidly Democratic state is precisely why it isn't a battleground state. The trend hasn't slowed, let alone reversed, so there's absolutely no reason to expect a different outcome this year.
I just find it more humorous than anything. It speaks to how completely clueless not only you are but the average Republican is if they think they've got to put a Trump candidacy down because it's putting New Mexico at risk, or that it's even still winnable for any of their candidates. There's no battle there; the Democrats have already won it. The only way they lose the state is if they've already lost the election, in which case the parties wouldn't be competing there anyway.
Writing tangential subject matter and presenting it as direct evidence =/= making your point. Claiming I don't understand anything is of course beyond old, never mind vacuous.
And spending 3-4 million dollars in the state isn't contesting it??? Unlike McCain in GA where he spent a few thousand, New Mexico was contested even by Obama. Now, when you're done making a mountain out of a molehill, my original central point stands. Now go fuck yourself.
Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.