Quote (thesnipa @ 13 Aug 2021 13:54)
you can't acknowledge they've had little legislative control AND take their policy at face value, a party out of power always throws wild pitches to rile up the base to regain control. look at the GOP "repealing obamacare" many times over while Obama was in office knowing it would get vetoed. then when given the chance under trump to fix it they did nothing. that's politics. ive said their messaging was more extreme than their legislation, specifically on the charge u laid on social issues which like obamacare they use to rile up the base.
Parties usually tend to make good on their campaign promises. More often than not, it doesn't pan out, but this doesn't mean they're not trying.
Sure, sometimes wild pitches are thrown around, but these always come with the risk of also riling up the other side in opposition.
The GOP tried in earnest to repeal Obamacare, keep in mind that they got super close. They were one John McCain thumbs up away from getting it done. (In which case they would have been fucking OBLITERATED in 2018, so they can thank him for saving them from themselves.)
That it would be tough to get the repeal bill through Congress given their slim majorities was no surprise. It's also a specific example in that the GOP never had a real debate about which alternative to Obamacare they actually want. By contrast, progressives have plenty of wonky people with specific plans and policies in store, like Elizabeth Warren.
Quote
out of context, watered down moderate legislation was again in contrast to scary social issue legislation like trans rights laws in canada or new categories of hate crimes that scare white people, not in historical context given their category (infrastructure in this context). and we're spending so much more because so many issues have been passed down, infrastructure is seriously suffering and needs and overhaul. overhauls are always expensive.
Except that most of Biden's spending spree is not slated for infrastructure:
Most of the $1.9 trillion covid relief bill was not infrastructure. Of the recently advanced $1 trillion infrastructure bill, "only" $550m consist of actually new spending. And the $3.5 trillion monstrosity that Dems are hoping to pass via budget reconciliation in upcoming months mostly consists of social spending that they misleadingly frame as "social infrastructure".
So of the over $5 trillion in spending that the Biden admin has already passed or intends to pass in the immediate future, less than $1 trillion is actually going to roads and bridges.
Hence, the decades of underspending and watching (physical) infrastructure crumble are not a valid excuse for the overall level of spending by the Biden admin
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Aug 14 2021 12:12am