d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Clinton 2016 > Finally, A Thread For Winners
Prev15657585960183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Aug 1 2016 02:20pm
Quote (herbdoc @ Aug 1 2016 12:18pm)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ezaw-g6TIQI


"physical barriers if necessary"

boy oh boy you got her now
Member
Posts: 4,320
Joined: Jun 10 2012
Gold: 12,983.50
Aug 1 2016 02:21pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Aug 1 2016 03:20pm)
"physical barriers if necessary"

boy oh boy you got her now


https://votesmart.org/bill/3764/12753/55463/triple-layered-fencing-amendment#.V5-aJvkrLRY

she voted for it
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Aug 1 2016 02:29pm
What if Trump dodges a debate and Johnson lucks out and gets 15% to get in the debate and it's Clinton vs Johnson

What if Johnson does better in this election than Trump?

What if....
Member
Posts: 38,317
Joined: Jul 12 2006
Gold: 20.31
Aug 1 2016 02:32pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Aug 1 2016 01:16pm)
some new polls out

some say that as high as 33+% of Trump supporters think Clinton has ties to Lucifer


Lol. It looked like the crappy Morning Consult poll had Clinton back up 43%-40% after a 44%-40% Trump lead, while CBS gave her a 46%-39% lead after a 42%-42% tie. They had her net favorability gaining 11 points and his back down to pre-convention levels. Gallup had a survey all about the conventions (Clinton's speech better received, Dems got better party consolidation with their supporters/leaners 81% to 73%, 44%/42% were more/less likely to support Clinton after the DNC vs. 36%/51% for Trump) and I guess they're still not doing horserace numbers after their disastrous 2012 outing.

Quote (Santara @ Aug 1 2016 12:06pm)
Why don't you remind yourself how Obama's appointee Sonia Sotomayor voted on McDonald v City of Chicago and say your retarded comment again while keeping a straight face, liar.


And? "Gun grabber" Antonin Scalia reaffirmed that the people, ie the court, through the people, have the right to determine what limitations exist on their rights. That's how our government works.

Quote (Goomshill @ Aug 1 2016 12:27pm)
Weighed in on it? I guess reading polls won't let you identify karl rove tactics if they danced naked in a sailors hat in front of you
Hillary's campaign scripted khan's speech and was prepared to instantly flood the media with condemnation if he took the bait


Yeah no.
Member
Posts: 49,872
Joined: Dec 23 2006
Gold: 0.00
Aug 1 2016 02:34pm
Quote (herbdoc @ Aug 1 2016 03:21pm)


but but what about the slogan build bridges not walls?
Member
Posts: 38,317
Joined: Jul 12 2006
Gold: 20.31
Aug 1 2016 03:17pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Aug 1 2016 01:29pm)
What if Trump dodges a debate and Johnson lucks out and gets 15% to get in the debate and it's Clinton vs Johnson

What if Johnson does better in this election than Trump?

What if....


He's already trying to weasel out of debating.

It's a multi-part plan: 1) Stall furiously in hopes he can bully the CPD, or at least de-legitimize the process in the eyes of his know-nothing supporters in the event he does have to debate so that he'll be insulated in case he bombs on stage. 2) Ask his dummies to start telling pollsters they support Johnson in order to bump him up to 15% support, then drop the demand he'll only debate Clinton if Johnson is included. 3) Then go back to stalling, using a disagreement on the format (who is included) as an excuse to not have to debate at all. 4) If he does have to debate, with Johnson included, spend the whole night running away from Clinton. 4a) If he has to debate without Johnson, spend the whole night whining that the process "was rigged" by Clinton against him.
Member
Posts: 4,320
Joined: Jun 10 2012
Gold: 12,983.50
Aug 1 2016 03:21pm
Quote (Pollster @ Aug 1 2016 04:17pm)
He's already trying to weasel out of debating.

It's a multi-part plan: 1) Stall furiously in hopes he can bully the CPD, or at least de-legitimize the process in the eyes of his know-nothing supporters in the event he does have to debate so that he'll be insulated in case he bombs on stage. 2) Ask his dummies to start telling pollsters they support Johnson in order to bump him up to 15% support, then drop the demand he'll only debate Clinton if Johnson is included. 3) Then go back to stalling, using a disagreement on the format (who is included) as an excuse to not have to debate at all. 4) If he does have to debate, with Johnson included, spend the whole night running away from Clinton. 4a) If he has to debate without Johnson, spend the whole night whining that the process "was rigged" by Clinton against him.


He's not trying to weasel out.
Show me a qoute that says he is NOT going to debate her.

This post was edited by herbdoc on Aug 1 2016 03:23pm
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Aug 1 2016 03:25pm
Quote (herbdoc @ 1 Aug 2016 13:21)
He's not trying to weasel out.
Show me a qoute that says he is NOT going to debate her.


Will, there's his straight up lie about getting a letter from the NFL and trying to claim the debates are rigged, which definitely looks like laying the groundwork for eventually tucking tail.

This post was edited by AiNedeSpelCzech on Aug 1 2016 03:25pm
Member
Posts: 4,320
Joined: Jun 10 2012
Gold: 12,983.50
Aug 1 2016 03:49pm
Nah he's just getting media attention
He won't tuck his tail
Trumpsters wiuld hate him and not vote
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15657585960183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll