d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Election Was Rigged, Trap Was Set, Its Coming
Prev15685695705715721965Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 38,522
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 1,005.00
Dec 21 2020 10:11pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Dec 21 2020 10:32pm)
You mean the ho that serviced Willie Brown on her knees?


The ho who will be your vice president
Member
Posts: 33,693
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,525.52
Dec 21 2020 10:12pm
Quote (kenw @ Dec 21 2020 11:11pm)
The ho who will be your vice president


Even Liz Warren would have been better imo.
Member
Posts: 38,522
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 1,005.00
Dec 21 2020 10:17pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Dec 21 2020 11:12pm)
Even Liz Warren would have been better imo.


I love the apprehension of the Biden's potential death lingering in conservative 's minds . I think she has even surpassed Obama in infamy . :lol:
Member
Posts: 33,693
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,525.52
Dec 21 2020 10:54pm
Quote (kenw @ Dec 21 2020 11:17pm)
I love the apprehension of the Biden's potential death lingering in conservative 's minds . I think she has even surpassed Obama in infamy . :lol:


Biden has a significant chance of stepping down within the next two years. I dont think Kamala will make the party look good. Biden isnt massively popular but he's likable.
Member
Posts: 5,216
Joined: Sep 18 2020
Gold: 101.80
Warn: 70%
Dec 21 2020 11:04pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Dec 22 2020 12:12am)
Even Liz Warren would have been better imo.


totally agree
that camel is disgusting
she is a drunk and completely demented and a coward as well
warren would have been the smarter sexist choice
Member
Posts: 30,055
Joined: Oct 25 2005
Gold: 3,462.00
Warn: 10%
Dec 22 2020 12:28am
Quote (darkhead69 @ Dec 21 2020 09:26pm)
your making statements based on anything but facts, 22 machines were forensically tested in Michigan, they found fraud and attempted coverup PERIOD
e

You are a liar.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2020/12/21/fox-news-newsmax-walk-back-election-fraud-claims-after-voting-machine-manufacturer-threatens-legal-action/?sh=79e334d4cfd2

Quote (kenw @ Dec 21 2020 10:51pm)
. You are unable to think rationally because you can't cope with reality.


tada. Nailed it.

darkhead69 and Jere are the same person. They are conjoined twins.

This post was edited by said_aouita on Dec 22 2020 12:33am
Member
Posts: 20,762
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 6,061.70
Dec 22 2020 01:56am
Quote (kenw @ 21 Dec 2020 18:43)
Will you accept Biden as your president?


This has to be the most hilarious question I've seen. To lead: Of course! The President is who the President is. The current President is Donald Trump. The next President is currently looking to be Joe Biden. Once Biden takes office, making the reasonable assumption he does, on January 20th, he's the president. Done deal. There's nothing to "accept".

Now, time to fire the question right back at you: Did you EVER accept Trump as your President? Or are you another idiot who spent 4 years keeping #NotMyPresident trending, now demanding that everyone else follow some magical rule you yourself never followed? The hypocrisy from the anti-Trumpers is so blaringly obvious, yet they claim some strange existence where they're being "reasonable". No, reasonable means having a discussion with a person you disagree with without accusing them of every evil you can imagine, assigning them devilish motives without any evidence, and then claiming to have discredited them because they're "bad". Progressives have NEVER been reasonable. The Progressive Stack has ALWAYS been toxic. Progressives do not wish to negotiate, they only seek power. The only "middle ground" with progressives is giving them complete control over your life, your labor, and your property. The only other option they see has been posted frequently in this very forum, "Bury all Conservatives alive." It's simply no longer possible to have a different viewpoint, value liberty, or personal rights. Because apparently, to a fascist, personal rights are actual fascist. FFS.

Quote (kenw @ 21 Dec 2020 20:17)
I love the apprehension of the Biden's potential death lingering in conservative 's minds . I think she has even surpassed Obama in infamy . :lol:


Harris has a very long record in public service. Anyone familiar with it is concerned with her being the VP, and the potential of her being President. Nothing to do with ethnicity or gender, everything to do with her specific actions. The fact that she was picked as VP due solely to her ethnicity and gender is racist and sexist. She was one of the least popular Presidential Candidates, and from a record standing, one of the least qualified. In all honesty, Gabbard would have been a great choice, and likely gotten Biden such a large chunk of moderate and independent support that there wouldn't be any contest over this election. But hey, what do I know?
Member
Posts: 38,522
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 1,005.00
Dec 22 2020 02:45am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Dec 22 2020 02:56am)
This has to be the most hilarious question I've seen. To lead: Of course! The President is who the President is. The current President is Donald Trump. The next President is currently looking to be Joe Biden. Once Biden takes office, making the reasonable assumption he does, on January 20th, he's the president. Done deal. There's nothing to "accept".

Now, time to fire the question right back at you: Did you EVER accept Trump as your President? Or are you another idiot who spent 4 years keeping #NotMyPresident trending, now demanding that everyone else follow some magical rule you yourself never followed? The hypocrisy from the anti-Trumpers is so blaringly obvious, yet they claim some strange existence where they're being "reasonable". No, reasonable means having a discussion with a person you disagree with without accusing them of every evil you can imagine, assigning them devilish motives without any evidence, and then claiming to have discredited them because they're "bad". Progressives have NEVER been reasonable. The Progressive Stack has ALWAYS been toxic. Progressives do not wish to negotiate, they only seek power. The only "middle ground" with progressives is giving them complete control over your life, your labor, and your property. The only other option they see has been posted frequently in this very forum, "Bury all Conservatives alive." It's simply no longer possible to have a different viewpoint, value liberty, or personal rights. Because apparently, to a fascist, personal rights are actual fascist. FFS.



Harris has a very long record in public service. Anyone familiar with it is concerned with her being the VP, and the potential of her being President. Nothing to do with ethnicity or gender, everything to do with her specific actions. The fact that she was picked as VP due solely to her ethnicity and gender is racist and sexist. She was one of the least popular Presidential Candidates, and from a record standing, one of the least qualified. In all honesty, Gabbard would have been a great choice, and likely gotten Biden such a large chunk of moderate and independent support that there wouldn't be any contest over this election. But hey, what do I know?


How is it racist to strategically opt for someone who can bring in the most amount of voters - unlike you, I'm sure his team did extensive research prior to choosing her. Is it racist then to vote for Obama? To vote for Hillary ? Some people just identity with others better . I never understood that line of reasoning and it's indicative that you might be a bigot. Would you say it's racist if rednecks enjoy Trumps divisive rhetoric? Their obsession with Barry's middle name? His origins? Do not try to rage race bait just because you hate or can't endure the fact that whites are becoming more and more a minority.

And yes, I was sad for three consecutive days and stopped posting here for almost 4 years out of disgust, but I did indeed accept the cult leader as commander in chief.
Member
Posts: 20,762
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 6,061.70
Dec 22 2020 03:22am
Quote (kenw @ 22 Dec 2020 00:45)
How is it racist to strategically opt for someone who can bring in the most amount of voters - unlike you, I'm sure his team did extensive research prior to choosing her. Is it racist then to vote for Obama? To vote for Hillary ? Some people just identity with others better . I never understood that line of reasoning and it's indicative that you might be a bigot. Would you say it's racist if rednecks enjoy Trumps divisive rhetoric? Their obsession with Barry's middle name? His origins? Do not try to rage race bait just because you hate or can't endure the fact that whites are becoming more and more a minority.

And yes, I was sad for three consecutive days and stopped posting here for almost 4 years out of disgust, but I did indeed accept the cult leader as commander in chief.


Harris was not popular and did not bring in an excess of voters, and quite possibly lost a great deal of voters. Progressives would vote against Trump regardless, and globalists and those who work for high end multinational corporations that have a solid foundation in the US would vote against Trump to protect their own self-interest. I said back in 2018 when things were ramping up for the starts of campaigns that the only person looking at the field who'd be likely to beat Trump would be Biden. Name recognition plus no firm stance on anything would win him the day. I also said repeatedly that the best strategy for his campaign for the general election would be to hide in the basement. Let the Trump Outrage Machine do it's work, collect all the benefits. Don't field real questions, don't answer real questions, avoid controversy of any form like the plague. We've steadily ramped up the controversy machine in American politics for the last 20 years to the point that there's a general fatigue the average voter is feeling. Unfortunately, Harris' record as DA and AG was 100% counter to everything the BLM movement and general anti police state movement stands for, and she has done absolutely nothing as a senator but shit talk Trump. She refuses to answer questions, justify her actions, and just laughs at anyone who levels any criticism. She has shown zero interest in negotiating across the isle, and is derisive of any democrat who does not fall in line with "accepted positions". On the flipside, somebody like Gabbard negotiates, looks into issues prior to commenting on them, is super likeable, and incredibly accessible. Her platform was certainly in line with what the average moderate democrat would prefer to see, without going full progressive. Her relationship with the Republican party and independents is amiable. She has no track record of putting the interests of multinational corporations above the well being of the American public, and she's stood for criminal reform from her first day in office. Not the "extend sentences and extort free labor" type of reform Harris is known for. Actual reform.

The end result of this election is what I predicted 2 years ago and was told I didn't know what the fuck I was talking about. Going back, I was informed that Biden was not popular, was not a solid choice, and nobody would turn out to vote for him. In the end, they were right, but I was more right. Biden was the perfect candidate to keep in the basement to allow people to vote against Trump. Harris, on the other hand, brought nothing to the table. Had Harris been the Presidential Candidate... Well, she was, wasn't she? And she had so little support that one debate with Gabbard and she dropped out of the race. Her polling was the worst on the docket. Nobody supported her, nobody liked her, and nobody would have voted for her. On the flipside, plenty liked Gabbard and were prepared to vote for her, left right and center. For her sake. Not to vote against Trump.

And your attempt to declare me a racist because I think Harris is garbage based on her record, her life's work, is garbage, and is very indicative that you yourself are racist. The very idea that you cannot criticize somebody's actions based on inherent traits such as skin color is the height of discrimination, and frankly you should feel ashamed of yourself. Obama got the vote because the media did an excellent job hiding his socialist agenda and he talked an amazing line about bringing jobs and opportunity back to the US, curtailing the outsourcing and non-competition work visa programs, and putting America first. His actions in office were 100% contrary to his words to get there, and are reflected in his drop in votes from 2008 to 2012. That said, I voted for him in 2008, I was certainly fooled. Does it make me a racist that I thought Obama was being honest rather than lying to my face?

Regarding "divisive rhetoric" that's a purely ridiculous talking point. You've made the comparison between Trump voters (74.2 million this year, weren't there) and white rednecks, and want to talk about divisive? The left has made every attempt to demonize those who disagree with them possible over the last 4 years, excused riots and murder by antifa and BLM, blocked relief bills for a shattered public during a pandemic for purely political reasons, downplayed historic middle eastern peace agreements, pushed for war against a sovereign nation without any proof of wrongdoing, and you're talking about "rhetoric"?

In the end, I think you're genuinely stupid. You claim Biden's team did "extensive research" before choosing Harris. You're either stupid or you're lying. Take your pick. Biden himself stated publicly that he would choose a women of color. His words. That narrowed the viable choices that would even possibly be accepted to 3. The very fact that government representation was chosen with the first two qualifiers being ethnicity and gender is literally racist and sexist. To claim the "most qualified candidate" was chosen as VP when 95% of the possibilities were dismissed without examination of their qualification puts the bold faced lie to your statement.

Any other ignorant bullshit you want to spout, or are you done?
Member
Posts: 38,522
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 1,005.00
Dec 22 2020 04:14am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Dec 22 2020 04:22am)
Harris was not popular and did not bring in an excess of voters, and quite possibly lost a great deal of voters. Progressives would vote against Trump regardless, and globalists and those who work for high end multinational corporations that have a solid foundation in the US would vote against Trump to protect their own self-interest. I said back in 2018 when things were ramping up for the starts of campaigns that the only person looking at the field who'd be likely to beat Trump would be Biden. Name recognition plus no firm stance on anything would win him the day. I also said repeatedly that the best strategy for his campaign for the general election would be to hide in the basement. Let the Trump Outrage Machine do it's work, collect all the benefits. Don't field real questions, don't answer real questions, avoid controversy of any form like the plague. We've steadily ramped up the controversy machine in American politics for the last 20 years to the point that there's a general fatigue the average voter is feeling. Unfortunately, Harris' record as DA and AG was 100% counter to everything the BLM movement and general anti police state movement stands for, and she has done absolutely nothing as a senator but shit talk Trump. She refuses to answer questions, justify her actions, and just laughs at anyone who levels any criticism. She has shown zero interest in negotiating across the isle, and is derisive of any democrat who does not fall in line with "accepted positions". On the flipside, somebody like Gabbard negotiates, looks into issues prior to commenting on them, is super likeable, and incredibly accessible. Her platform was certainly in line with what the average moderate democrat would prefer to see, without going full progressive. Her relationship with the Republican party and independents is amiable. She has no track record of putting the interests of multinational corporations above the well being of the American public, and she's stood for criminal reform from her first day in office. Not the "extend sentences and extort free labor" type of reform Harris is known for. Actual reform.

The end result of this election is what I predicted 2 years ago and was told I didn't know what the fuck I was talking about. Going back, I was informed that Biden was not popular, was not a solid choice, and nobody would turn out to vote for him. In the end, they were right, but I was more right. Biden was the perfect candidate to keep in the basement to allow people to vote against Trump. Harris, on the other hand, brought nothing to the table. Had Harris been the Presidential Candidate... Well, she was, wasn't she? And she had so little support that one debate with Gabbard and she dropped out of the race. Her polling was the worst on the docket. Nobody supported her, nobody liked her, and nobody would have voted for her. On the flipside, plenty liked Gabbard and were prepared to vote for her, left right and center. For her sake. Not to vote against Trump.

And your attempt to declare me a racist because I think Harris is garbage based on her record, her life's work, is garbage, and is very indicative that you yourself are racist. The very idea that you cannot criticize somebody's actions based on inherent traits such as skin color is the height of discrimination, and frankly you should feel ashamed of yourself. Obama got the vote because the media did an excellent job hiding his socialist agenda and he talked an amazing line about bringing jobs and opportunity back to the US, curtailing the outsourcing and non-competition work visa programs, and putting America first. His actions in office were 100% contrary to his words to get there, and are reflected in his drop in votes from 2008 to 2012. That said, I voted for him in 2008, I was certainly fooled. Does it make me a racist that I thought Obama was being honest rather than lying to my face?

Regarding "divisive rhetoric" that's a purely ridiculous talking point. You've made the comparison between Trump voters (74.2 million this year, weren't there) and white rednecks, and want to talk about divisive? The left has made every attempt to demonize those who disagree with them possible over the last 4 years, excused riots and murder by antifa and BLM, blocked relief bills for a shattered public during a pandemic for purely political reasons, downplayed historic middle eastern peace agreements, pushed for war against a sovereign nation without any proof of wrongdoing, and you're talking about "rhetoric"?

In the end, I think you're genuinely stupid. You claim Biden's team did "extensive research" before choosing Harris. You're either stupid or you're lying. Take your pick. Biden himself stated publicly that he would choose a women of color. His words. That narrowed the viable choices that would even possibly be accepted to 3. The very fact that government representation was chosen with the first two qualifiers being ethnicity and gender is literally racist and sexist. To claim the "most qualified candidate" was chosen as VP when 95% of the possibilities were dismissed without examination of their qualification puts the bold faced lie to your statement.

Any other ignorant bullshit you want to spout, or are you done?


I'm not even going to lie - I barely know Gabbard. I did a bit of digging during the democratic debates a year ago and after learning she voted present during Trump's impeachment and didn't vote like 85% of the time as an elected Congresswoman, I wasn't really impressed. I would have personally preferred Warren but I think Kamala was the safest option out of all three. Yes, he could have probably amassed more Republicans or independents if she had been picked but IMO he would have bled even more Democrats because she's not particularly liked in the party from what I've seen. They both performed poorly at the end of the day . Biden didn't want to take the risk of alienating his core base by choosing a wild card.

My qualm with you is when you categorize people as racist or sexist or unpatriotic just because of they identify more with ones gender, birth place, race, etc. You would think that most voters are informed when you look at social media platforms but from my experience, people there are the vocal minority . If you ever were to canvass neighborhoods , you'd realize that the average person isn't an online debating edgelord and essentially only know the basics such as a vague nothing of health care - nothing else. Do I personally agree with voting mostly on race or gender, not really but if you cannot extrapolate that and try to twist this into some kind of affirmative action argument. Just because you hate her doesn't make her unqualified or undeserving of the title - she's not some random homeless person Joe picked off the street.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15685695705715721965Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll